Skip to main content

Park assist - Technology may be ready for mass market but user experience is not

Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles. Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics. The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the p
June 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles.  Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics.

The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the primary usability issues associated with park assist systems relate to the wide prevalence of unclear and inconsistent human-machine interfaces (HMIs). A relatively new feature, especially to the mid-range market, a number of aspects of these systems are still not standardised.

Derick Viita, report author commented, "At present, each OEM is taking their best bet on how these systems should be labelled, where the HMI should be located, and how it should function. Unfortunately, basic human factor principles were not taken into account in many implementations. For example, a park assist control which is located next to the driver's knee violates control-display compatibility and is unlikely to be discovered; and the use of a cluster for subtle notifications prior to system takeover is also concerning as it encourages the driver to stare at the cluster rather than monitor their surroundings."

Chris Schreiner, director, User Experience Innovation Practice added, "An intuitive HMI and a reliably comfortable and time-saving parking experience are keys to earning trust from consumers.  Our review indicates that while the technology is clearly ready for the mass market, the user experience is not."

Related Content

  • Need for secure approach to connected vehicle technology
    January 7, 2013
    Accidental or malicious issue of false messages to connected vehicles could result in dire consequences, so secure systems of authentication and certification are likely to be necessary, write Paul Avery and Sandra Dykes. Connectivity among vehicles in urban traffic systems will provide opportunity for beneficial impacts such as congestion reduction and greater safety. However, it also creates security risks with the potential for targeted disruption. Security algorithms, protocols and procedures must take
  • TM 2.0 boost TMC data feed and driver influence
    November 15, 2017
    TM 2.0 views connected vehicles and V2I as two-way communications channels, benefitting traffic management and drivers, as Alan Dron discovers. As connected vehicles are progressively rolled out there will come a point at which traffic managers and traffic management centres (TMCs) will have to gear up to cope with a rapidly-evolving road scenario. The TM 2.0 Platform (see box) is promoting a concept of new-generation traffic management (which carries the same TM 2.0 title) and is studying how future T
  • All around the world: #ITSDubai2024
    September 5, 2024
    The bosses of the three major international ITS organisations – ITS America, Ertico and ITS Asia-Pacific – have put their heads together on a podcast. Beate Kubitz listens in…
  • e-Call emergency service doesn't go far enough
    January 30, 2012
    eCall misses the point and is only a tacit acknowledgement that the road safety issue has not yet been adequately addressed, according to FEMA's Aline Delhaye. According to the Federation of European Motorcyclists' Associations (FEMA), the European Commission's (EC's) ambitions for eCall implementation are premature and fail to take account of all road users' needs or of technological progress elsewhere.