Skip to main content

Park assist - Technology may be ready for mass market but user experience is not

Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles. Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics. The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the p
June 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
Intelligent parking assistance systems which take over a portion of a parking task are becoming increasingly common in mid-range and premium model vehicles.  Touted as convenience features which allow drivers to park in small spaces with comfort and ease, usability bugs have been identified in some of the current implementations, according to a new evaluation by the Automotive Consumer Insights group (ACI) at Strategy Analytics.

The evaluation of advanced parking assistants in several vehicles says the primary usability issues associated with park assist systems relate to the wide prevalence of unclear and inconsistent human-machine interfaces (HMIs). A relatively new feature, especially to the mid-range market, a number of aspects of these systems are still not standardised.

Derick Viita, report author commented, "At present, each OEM is taking their best bet on how these systems should be labelled, where the HMI should be located, and how it should function. Unfortunately, basic human factor principles were not taken into account in many implementations. For example, a park assist control which is located next to the driver's knee violates control-display compatibility and is unlikely to be discovered; and the use of a cluster for subtle notifications prior to system takeover is also concerning as it encourages the driver to stare at the cluster rather than monitor their surroundings."

Chris Schreiner, director, User Experience Innovation Practice added, "An intuitive HMI and a reliably comfortable and time-saving parking experience are keys to earning trust from consumers.  Our review indicates that while the technology is clearly ready for the mass market, the user experience is not."

Related Content

  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being
  • Mobile communications could revolutionise traffic management
    February 1, 2012
    Rudolf Mietzner looks at how machine-to-machine technologies and applications will affect the automotive sector in the coming years
  • Driver monitoring systems ‘will use inward-looking camera-based technology’
    November 9, 2015
    New analysis from Frost & Sullivan, Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Strategies for Driver Monitoring Systems in Europe, indicates that, as the loss of driver attention due to fatigue or drowsiness is a common cause of road accidents worldwide, there is a clear need for driver monitoring systems (DMSs) globally. DMSs can analyse driver behaviour or detect patterns tending towards micro-sleep to issue appropriate warnings and help revive the driver’s focus. Several original equipment manufacturers (O
  • Navigating the data privacy landscape
    July 24, 2023
    If customer data is not protected then the journey towards better, less polluting public transport solutions is likely to be delayed, warns Alexis Suggett of Cubic Transportation Systems