Skip to main content

NHTSA studies hacking risks to automated vehicles

A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat. “These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senat
May 21, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat.

“These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senate Commerce Committee hearing. “We don’t want to be behind the eight ball.”

A new office within the agency to research vehicle-electronics safety will look at risks to the systems in cars and those that communicate with other vehicles. NHTSA is conducting a pilot project in Ann Arbor, Michigan, of so-called talking-car technology intended to prevent crashes.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller said while he’s excited about safety improvements through technology, he’s concerned about new risks including hacking.

Regulators are preparing for the possibility that cars could be accessed remotely in the future, though now a person would need to have physical access to a vehicle to redirect its electronic functions, Strickland said.

“If there is a chance of it happening, we have to address it,” Strickland told reporters after the hearing.

NHTSA and others developing new vehicle-control technologies need consumers to accept them if they’re to penetrate the market and provide safety benefits, Strickland said. If consumers don’t trust the technology, they won’t buy it, he said.

“Cybersecurity is hard,” he told reporters. “Even the best systems in the world can be compromised, as we have seen.”
 
Strickland said the agency plans to decide by the end of this year whether to regulate crash-imminent braking, a technology that applies brakes automatically if sensors indicate there’s about to be a crash.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • NHTSA urged to strike a balance on hybrid and EV sound requirements
    March 18, 2013
    In its comments to the National Highway Traffic Safety administration's (NHTSA) proposed rule to add sound to hybrid and electric vehicles, Global Automakers is asking the agency to find a noise level that effectively alerts pedestrians without being excessively loud. "Striking a balance is important," said Michael Cammisa, director of safety for Global Automakers, which represents international motor vehicle manufacturers, original equipment suppliers, and other automotive-related trade associations. "W
  • Swarco: ‘Everyone’s running after buzzwords’
    April 1, 2019
    The ITS world finds itself in a time of great change. Swarco’s Michael Schuch talks to Adam Hill about connectivity, the increasing importance of the end user – and why you shouldn’t leave your core business behind
  • Putting the brakes on smart motorways
    February 28, 2022
    The UK government has announced that development of its all-lane running highways is going to be put on hold for another few years to assess safety data. Adam Hill finds out why
  • Is road user charging the first stop for congestion management?
    July 23, 2012
    David Hytch, Information Systems Director at the Greater Manchester Public Transport Executive, considers just where congestion pricing schemes should sit in transport planners' hierarchy of options for managing demand. On the face of it, Greater Manchester in England's proposed congestion charging scheme hit just about every sweet spot possible when it came to convincing the general public of the need for and benefits of such a venture. There was the promise from national government of almost £3bn-worth of