Skip to main content

NHTSA studies hacking risks to automated vehicles

A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat. “These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senat
May 21, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat.

“These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senate Commerce Committee hearing. “We don’t want to be behind the eight ball.”

A new office within the agency to research vehicle-electronics safety will look at risks to the systems in cars and those that communicate with other vehicles. NHTSA is conducting a pilot project in Ann Arbor, Michigan, of so-called talking-car technology intended to prevent crashes.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller said while he’s excited about safety improvements through technology, he’s concerned about new risks including hacking.

Regulators are preparing for the possibility that cars could be accessed remotely in the future, though now a person would need to have physical access to a vehicle to redirect its electronic functions, Strickland said.

“If there is a chance of it happening, we have to address it,” Strickland told reporters after the hearing.

NHTSA and others developing new vehicle-control technologies need consumers to accept them if they’re to penetrate the market and provide safety benefits, Strickland said. If consumers don’t trust the technology, they won’t buy it, he said.

“Cybersecurity is hard,” he told reporters. “Even the best systems in the world can be compromised, as we have seen.”
 
Strickland said the agency plans to decide by the end of this year whether to regulate crash-imminent braking, a technology that applies brakes automatically if sensors indicate there’s about to be a crash.

Related Content

  • May 2, 2018
    Interview: Jarrett Walker, author of Human Transit
    Elon Musk has called him a ‘sanctimonious idiot’ but public transit expert Jarrett Walker tells Andrew Stone that more data and smarter cars aren't the answer to mass mobility...
  • March 3, 2020
    CES 2020: ITS does Vegas
    Keen to find out what the future holds, 170,000 people gathered in Las Vegas for CES 2020 to see 20,000 product debuts and 4,400 exhibitors... and ITS International was there too (All images: CES®)
  • March 24, 2014
    ITS needs to talk the talk as well as walk the walk
    The US automated enforcement market is in rude health as the number of systems and applications continues to grow and broaden. Jason Barnes reports. Blessed and cursed – arguably, in equal measure – with a constitution which stresses the right to self-expression and determination, the US has had a harder journey than most to the more widespread use of automated traffic enforcement systems. In some cases, opposition to the concept has been extreme – including the murder of a roadside civil enforcement offici
  • February 13, 2015
    Crashes affect one in three but drivers continue to take risks
    According to the AAA Foundation’s latest Traffic Safety Culture Index, too many Americans report that they regularly speed, run red lights, use distracting devices or drive drowsy, despite the fact that one in three have a loved one who has been seriously injured or killed in a crash. The results further find that unsafe behaviour persists even though one in five drivers have themselves been involved in a serious crash, and one in ten has been seriously injured in a crash. These most recent findings from