Skip to main content

NHTSA studies hacking risks to automated vehicles

A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat. “These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senat
May 21, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
A report by Bloomberg says that rising hacking risks to drivers as their cars become increasingly powered by and connected to computers have prompted the US’s auto-safety regulator to start a new office focusing on the threat.

“These interconnected electronics systems are creating opportunities to improve vehicle safety and reliability, but are also creating new and different safety and cybersecurity risks,” David Strickland, head of the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said at a recent Senate Commerce Committee hearing. “We don’t want to be behind the eight ball.”

A new office within the agency to research vehicle-electronics safety will look at risks to the systems in cars and those that communicate with other vehicles. NHTSA is conducting a pilot project in Ann Arbor, Michigan, of so-called talking-car technology intended to prevent crashes.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller said while he’s excited about safety improvements through technology, he’s concerned about new risks including hacking.

Regulators are preparing for the possibility that cars could be accessed remotely in the future, though now a person would need to have physical access to a vehicle to redirect its electronic functions, Strickland said.

“If there is a chance of it happening, we have to address it,” Strickland told reporters after the hearing.

NHTSA and others developing new vehicle-control technologies need consumers to accept them if they’re to penetrate the market and provide safety benefits, Strickland said. If consumers don’t trust the technology, they won’t buy it, he said.

“Cybersecurity is hard,” he told reporters. “Even the best systems in the world can be compromised, as we have seen.”
 
Strickland said the agency plans to decide by the end of this year whether to regulate crash-imminent braking, a technology that applies brakes automatically if sensors indicate there’s about to be a crash.

Related Content

  • June 12, 2015
    NTSB calls for immediate action on collision avoidance systems for vehicles
    A report by the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) outlines the life-saving benefits of currently available collision avoidance systems and recommends that the technology become standard on all new passenger and commercial vehicles. The report, The Use of Forward Collision Avoidance Systems to Prevent and Mitigate Rear-End Crashes, stresses that collision avoidance systems can prevent or lessen the severity of rear-end crashes, thus saving lives and reducing injuries. According to statistics fro
  • October 22, 2013
    Too safe for safety’s sake
    In-vehicle systems are making huge advances in vehicle safety with the introduction of ABS, collision avoidance, adaptive cruise control, lane departure alert and blind spot warning… the list goes on. But at the same time accidents are still happening and arguably getting bigger. A look at a list of multi-vehicle (30 - 300) accidents across Europe, North and South America and parts of the Middle East shows that the trend is increasing with 2013 already having witnessed seven such incidents – three of which
  • February 27, 2012
    Good money after bad
    Fundamentally, as human beings, we tend to want much the same things
  • May 4, 2020
    MaaS: 130,000 chances for a bad user experience
    Johan Herrlin, CEO of transit data specialist Ito World, puts himself in the hotseat with ITS International to talk about, among other things, why a beautifully designed MaaS app with a perfect subscription model is still a failure if you get your customers lost along the way