Skip to main content

NHTSA looking at alcohol detection technology

Speaking at a Management Briefing Seminar at the Traverse City Conference in Michigan, US, Nat Beuse, associate administrator for vehicle safety research at the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said alcohol detection technology is one of several his agency is studying to lower traffic fatalities.
August 5, 2014 Read time: 2 mins

Speaking at a Management Briefing Seminar at the Traverse City Conference in Michigan, US, Nat Beuse, associate administrator for vehicle safety research at the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said alcohol detection technology is one of several his agency is studying to lower traffic fatalities.

According to NHTSA, alcohol-impaired motor vehicle crashes cost more than an estimated US$37 billion annually; in 2012 more than 10,000 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes - one every 51 minutes.

The report in the conference daily paper published by Automotive News says Beuse gave no details as to how the technology would work or which suppliers were involved in the technology, but said a seamless alcohol detection system which was integrated into vehicles would reduce the number of alcohol-related fatalities on US roads.

NHTSA for the last few years has been stepping up its efforts to push technology solutions to drunken driving. In October 2011, it awarded a U$S2.2 million contract to safety products supplier Takata Corporation to develop a device that measures a motorist's sobriety. Another safety products supplier, Autoliv, is also working on the sobriety systems.

Though still under development and in need of testing, the alcohol detection technology could be available for implementation by 2018, although whether it would disable a vehicle or simply issue an alert is still to be determined, federal officials said.

Beuse said vehicle fatalities in total have been declining in the United States over the last several decades, but still kill over 33,000 people a year and incur a cost estimated at $827 billion annually, Beuse said. Increased levels of vehicle autonomy promise to lower both numbers in coming years.

Related Content

  • Nearly 10,000 distracted drivers caught twice in last four years
    November 4, 2016
    Data received by the BBC following a Freedom of Information request to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) reveals that almost 10,000 drivers have been caught twice for being distracted while driving, including using a mobile phone, in the last four years. The data refers to the number of drivers who have received CU80 endorsements in the past four years, which is how long the DVLA keeps its records. CU80 endorsements, which carry a three point penalty, cover a breach of requirements regarding
  • TfL to trial new bus sensor technology
    August 1, 2014
    Transport for London (TfL) is to trial detection software to enhance bus driver awareness of pedestrians and cyclists. The six-week trial will start later this month as part of a continued drive to improve road safety in the capital. Four buses will be fitted with brand new pedestrian and cyclist detection software which directly alerts bus drivers when pedestrians and cyclists are moving close to their vehicles, helping to reduce collisions. TfL is trialling two systems, CycleEye from Fusion Processi
  • IRF World Congress 2024: 'Silent pandemic' of road deaths must be reduced
    October 16, 2024
    Day 1 of three-day meeting in Istanbul focuses on sustainability and safety
  • No evidence California cellphone ban decreased accidents, says researcher
    July 18, 2014
    In a recent study, a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder found no evidence that a California ban on using hand-held cellphones while driving decreased the number of traffic accidents in the state in the first six months following the ban. The findings, published in the journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, are surprising given prior research that suggests driving while using a cellphone is risky; past laboratory studies have shown that people who talk on a cellphone wh