Skip to main content

NHTSA looking at alcohol detection technology

Speaking at a Management Briefing Seminar at the Traverse City Conference in Michigan, US, Nat Beuse, associate administrator for vehicle safety research at the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said alcohol detection technology is one of several his agency is studying to lower traffic fatalities.
August 5, 2014 Read time: 2 mins

Speaking at a Management Briefing Seminar at the Traverse City Conference in Michigan, US, Nat Beuse, associate administrator for vehicle safety research at the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said alcohol detection technology is one of several his agency is studying to lower traffic fatalities.

According to NHTSA, alcohol-impaired motor vehicle crashes cost more than an estimated US$37 billion annually; in 2012 more than 10,000 people died in alcohol-impaired driving crashes - one every 51 minutes.

The report in the conference daily paper published by Automotive News says Beuse gave no details as to how the technology would work or which suppliers were involved in the technology, but said a seamless alcohol detection system which was integrated into vehicles would reduce the number of alcohol-related fatalities on US roads.

NHTSA for the last few years has been stepping up its efforts to push technology solutions to drunken driving. In October 2011, it awarded a U$S2.2 million contract to safety products supplier Takata Corporation to develop a device that measures a motorist's sobriety. Another safety products supplier, Autoliv, is also working on the sobriety systems.

Though still under development and in need of testing, the alcohol detection technology could be available for implementation by 2018, although whether it would disable a vehicle or simply issue an alert is still to be determined, federal officials said.

Beuse said vehicle fatalities in total have been declining in the United States over the last several decades, but still kill over 33,000 people a year and incur a cost estimated at $827 billion annually, Beuse said. Increased levels of vehicle autonomy promise to lower both numbers in coming years.

Related Content

  • November 20, 2013
    US Congress debates autonomous vehicles
    Emerging technologies have the potential to significantly reduce vehicle crashes and associated fatalities, according to Kirk Steudle, director of the Michigan Department of Transportation, testifying at the US House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Subcommittee on Highways and Transit. Speaking on behalf of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Steudle said, "Nothing is more exciting than the potential safety benefits of this emerging technology," said Steud
  • February 5, 2016
    Drink-drive casualty figures ‘unacceptable’ says IAM
    The numbers of people killed and seriously injured on British roads as a result of drink driving have remained largely static for the last five years, according to the latest government figures. The figures show that between 210 and 270 people were killed in accidents in Britain where at least one driver was over the drink-drive limit, with a central estimate of 240 deaths; unchanged since 2010. The number of seriously injured casualties in drink-drive accidents fell by per cent from 1,100 in 2013 to
  • June 5, 2015
    The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • September 12, 2014
    Transportation guru sceptical about V2V technology
    Robert Poole, co-founder of the Reason Foundation, has worked on transportation policy for more than three decades and is an influential voice on tolling, congestion pricing and infrastructure finance. Writing in his monthly newsletter (link http://reason.org/news/show/surface-transportation-news-131) he voices his scepticism of vehicle to vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) technology which may one day allow cars to communicate with each other and with traffic infrastructure to avoid colli