Skip to main content

Most Honda owners turn off lane departure warning, says IIHS

Owners of Hondas with crash avoidance features are much more likely to have forward collision warning turned on than lane departure warning, IIHS researchers found in a recent observational survey. The researchers observed vehicles brought in to Honda dealerships for service. They found that all but one of 184 models equipped with the two features had forward collision warning turned on, while only a third of vehicles had lane departure warning activated. IIHS says the findings are consistent with pre
March 8, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
Owners of Hondas with crash avoidance features are much more likely to have forward collision warning turned on than lane departure warning, IIHS researchers found in a recent observational survey.

The researchers observed vehicles brought in to Honda dealerships for service. They found that all but one of 184 models equipped with the two features had forward collision warning turned on, while only a third of vehicles had lane departure warning activated.

IIHS says the findings are consistent with previous research showing that vehicle owners found lane departure warning more annoying than other crash avoidance technologies. They may also help explain why studies so far haven't found a consistent benefit from the feature, in contrast to forward collision.

Most lane departure warning systems use a camera to detect lane markings and depend on turn signal use to determine whether a driver intentionally changed lanes or not. Many people don't use turn signals consistently, so the result is a lot of alerts that drivers may perceive as false alarms. Camera sensors also may detect markings such as shifted lanes in construction zones that lead to more nuisance alerts.

"Lane departure warning has the potential to prevent a lot of the most serious crashes," says Ian Reagan, an IIHS senior research scientist and the study's lead author. "However, if people consider it a turn-signal nanny, they may not accept the feature."

For the new study, researchers observed 2013-15 Honda Accords, 2014-15 Odysseys and 2015 CR-Vs at dealerships in Virginia.

In addition to driver preferences, another reason lane departure warning may be turned off more often in these Hondas is that it is simple to do so by pressing a button near the instrument panel. In contrast, to turn off forward collision warning in the Accord and the Odyssey, a driver needs to navigate through several steps of the vehicle settings menu.

The CR-V has a button for its collision mitigation braking system, which includes forward collision warning. However none of the six CR-Vs observed had collision mitigation turned off.

All the vehicles retain the previous on/off setting for each of the two features from one trip to the next.

"In the future, it would be useful to compare systems with different types of alerts and levels of sensitivity to see whether those differences make people more or less likely to use the technologies," Reagan says.

Related Content

  • Seleta Reynolds: 'Drivers don't pay full cost'
    August 29, 2022
    Newly-appointed chief innovation officer at LA Metro suggests congestion pricing will help
  • Delivering accurate vehicle identification
    August 1, 2012
    In the Netherlands, TNO, the independent research organisation, has been engaged in a project on behalf of the RDW, the Dutch vehicle registration and licensing authority, intended to look at the feasibility of using electronic means to make vehicle identification more accurate and less susceptible to fraud. Electronic Vehicle Identification (EVI) has been in existence in various forms for several years now but TNO was tasked with finding out whether OnBoard Unit (OBU)-based applications could be complement
  • Self-driving car safety perspectives
    June 2, 2015
    At yesterday’s Opening Plenary, Chris Urmson’s keynote speech dealt with the reality of driverless cars on our roads. By far and away their greatest benefit to mankind will be the potential to achieve an incredible saving of life and injury on the roads, as Urmson, director of the Google Self-Driving Car program, revealed to delegates. In response to an Associated Press article last month disclosing that self-driving cars have been involved in four accidents in the state of California, Urmson revealed th
  • Nine in 10 people want tougher sentences for drivers who kill
    July 11, 2016
    A study to mark the launch of Brake’s new Roads to Justice Campaign shows there is huge support for strengthening both the charges and sentences faced by criminal drivers. Ninety-one per cent of people questioned agreed that if someone causes a fatal crash when they get behind the wheel after drinking or taking drugs, they should be charged with manslaughter. That carries a possible life sentence. At present people can either be charged with causing death by dangerous driving or causing death by careless