Skip to main content

Intelligent vehicle insurance launches in the UK

Ctrack is launching a telematics solution for vehicle insurers in the UK to rate how, when, where and by whom a vehicle is driven. The company, a leading provider of vehicle tracking solutions in the UK, says that Ctrack Intelligent Insurance offers providers an alternative means of determining individual vehicle premiums, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice in March this year that prevents gender being taken into account as a risk factor.
April 25, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSCtrack is launching a telematics solution for vehicle insurers in the UK to rate how, when, where and by whom a vehicle is driven. The company,  a leading provider of vehicle tracking solutions in the UK, says that Ctrack Intelligent Insurance offers providers an alternative means of determining individual vehicle premiums, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice in March this year that prevents gender being taken into account as a risk factor.

Risk is currently calculated by insurance companies based on generic data that only shows an average risk per group, which means that everyone in a specific group pays the same premium, whether they are better or riskier drivers. Female drivers have traditionally paid a lower monthly premium than male drivers, because generic statistics show that male drivers are involved in more accidents.
Johan van der Merwe, director of insurance telematics at Ctrack, commented: “Ctrack Intelligent Insurance addresses the issues created by the ruling, which underlines the importance of defining risk in other, more effective ways. Our solution will not only provide the data for insurers to rate drivers, but enable them to interpret the data as well.”

He believes the very nature of the solution will create a culture of high-level social interaction between insurers and consumers, where premiums are determined by insurers according to the way vehicles are driven.

“Insurers should only determine risk based on distance, speed, time of day and driving attitude. Ctrack Intelligent Insurance proactively ensures that drivers exhibit safety conscious behaviours when they step into their vehicle. There will be no more arguments about the main driver, should an accident occur, and insurance conditions can be relaxed for drivers with a good driving profile.

“We envisage that our telematic solution will revolutionise insurance risk calculation, the nature of the relationship between the insurer and the driver and ultimately the way vehicles are driven. We are moving away from the era of insurance being a grudge purchase, and entering an era where premiums will be based on actual driver behaviour,” van der Merwe concludes.

Related Content

  • March 13, 2012
    89 million insurance telematics subscribers by 2017
    According to new research by ABI Research, insurance telematics users will grow at a CAGR of 90 per cent from 1.85 million in 2010 to 89 million in 2017.
  • July 17, 2012
    Progress towards a pan-European cooperative infrastructure
    Kallistratos Dionelis, General Secretary of ASECAP, makes the case for a lightly regulated, staged progression towards a pan-European cooperative infrastructure environment, the achievement of which should look to engender cooperation between the public and private sectors. Such an approach, he says, is the only real path to success.
  • June 5, 2015
    The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • December 4, 2012
    Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t