Skip to main content

Hackers remotely control jeep

Two US security experts have demonstrated security flaws in a Jeep Cherokee by taking wireless control of its systems from ten miles away. Writing on technology website Wired, Andy Greenberg, who was driving the jeep at the time, tells how Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek first toyed with the vehicle’s air conditioning, entertainment system and windscreen wipers, before cutting the transmission and causing the jeep to slowly come to a halt. Greenberg says, “The most disturbing manoeuvre came when they
July 22, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
Two US security experts have demonstrated security flaws in a Jeep Cherokee by taking wireless control of its systems from ten miles away.

Writing on technology website Wired, Andy Greenberg, who was driving the jeep at the time, tells how Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek first toyed with the vehicle’s air conditioning, entertainment system and windscreen wipers, before cutting the transmission and causing the jeep to slowly come to a halt.

Greenberg says, “The most disturbing manoeuvre came when they cut the jeep’s brakes, leaving me frantically pumping the pedal as the 2-ton SUV slid uncontrollably into a ditch.”

The researchers say they’re working on perfecting their steering control—for now they can only hijack the wheel when the jeep is in reverse. Their hack enables surveillance too: They can track a targeted jeep’s GPS coordinates, measure its speed, and even drop pins on a map to trace its route.

According to Greenberg, all of this is possible only because 1958 Chrysler, like many carmakers, is doing its best to turn the modern automobile into a smartphone. Uconnect, an internet-connected computer feature in hundreds of thousands of Fiat Chrysler cars, SUVs, and trucks, controls the vehicle’s entertainment and navigation, enables phone calls, and even offers a wi-fi hot spot. And thanks to one vulnerable element, which Miller and Valasek won’t currently identify, Uconnect’s cellular connection also lets anyone who knows the car’s IP address gain access from anywhere in the country.

“From an attacker’s perspective, it’s a super nice vulnerability,” Miller says.

Miller and Valasek say the attack on the entertainment system seems to work on any Chrysler vehicle with Uconnect from late 2013, all of 2014, and early 2015. They’ve only tested their full set of physical hacks, including ones targeting transmission and braking systems, on a Jeep Cherokee, though they believe that most of their attacks could be tweaked to work on any Chrysler vehicle with the vulnerable Uconnect head unit.

After being contacted by Miller and Valasek nine months ago, Fiat Chrysler developed a patch which must be manually implemented via a USB stick or by a dealership mechanic.

Related Content

  • August 5, 2022
    Peter Norton: “My fear is that the technology itself is mistaken for the answer”
    Peter Norton, author of Autonorama, tells Adam Hill why automakers kept the consumer dissatisfied, why Futurama got such a hold on the public imagination – and about how active travel can be promoted
  • July 14, 2023
    What Citizen Kane can teach transportation engineers
    Andy Boenau suggests that one of the most famous movies of all time might have lessons for our industry. And they’re all about not knowing things...
  • February 26, 2016
    Nissan disables Leaf app following hacking scare
    According to news reports, Nissan has disabled its NissanConnect EV app after it was found that hackers could remotely control in-car systems. Security researcher Troy Hunt discovered the vulnerability during a software workshop he was attending and has detailed his findings on his blog. In a test with fellow researcher Scott Helme, they found they were able to remotely turn on the car's heated seating, heated steering wheel, fans and air conditioning. According to Helmes, “Fortunately, the Nissan Le
  • October 27, 2016
    The downside of driverless vehicles
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions