Skip to main content

Google AV in collision with public transit bus

According to a report made by Google to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), one of its autonomous vehicles (AV) has been in collision with a municipal bus in California. The crash happened on Valentine’s Day, when the Lexus RX-450H was travelling in autonomous mode in the right-hand lane approaching an intersection. It moved to the far right lane to make a right turn, but stopped when it detected sand bags sitting around a storm drain and blocking its path.
March 1, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
According to a report made by 1691 Google to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), one of its autonomous vehicles (AV) has been in collision with a municipal bus in California.

The crash happened on Valentine’s Day, when the 4349 Lexus RX-450H was travelling in autonomous mode in the right-hand lane approaching an intersection. It moved to the far right lane to make a right turn, but stopped when it detected sand bags sitting around a storm drain and blocking its path.

According to the DMV report, “After a few cars had passed, the Google AV began to proceed back into the center of the lane to pass the sand bags. A public transit bus was approaching from behind. The Google AV test driver saw the bus approaching in the left side mirror but believed the bus would stop or slow to allow the Google AV to continue. Approximately three seconds later, as the Google AV was re-entering the center of the lane it made contact with the side of the bus.”

Jonathan Hewett, head of strategy at insurance telematics specialist, Octo Telematics, comments, “The advent of autonomous cars could revolutionise transportation, offering a safer, more fuel-efficient and comfortable experience. However, the recent crash between a municipal bus and Google’s self-driving Lexus RX450h in California demonstrates that we still have numerous hurdles to overcome on the path to a driverless future.
 
“Experts acknowledge it could be decades before regulators allow vehicles to be built without manual controls, and it is possible that during the transition period when conventional and self-driving vehicles would share the road, safety might actually worsen. It’s clear that throughout this journey, the insurance industry will play an important role, supporting this evolution by providing data driven insurance at every stage.
 
“Some might argue that if autonomous cars become ‘crashless’, we may not need motor insurance. But this viewpoint is overstated. A January 2015 study by the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute said it is not clear whether a self-driving vehicle would ever perform more safely than an experienced driver. More likely, autonomous cars will significantly reduce the number of accidents that occur, meaning less claims but requiring more sophisticated assessment. As autonomous cars are driven by navigational data provided by a series of sensors, any accident will require software and hardware analysis to understand why it occurred and analogous to ‘black box’ flight recorders in aviation. Therefore telematics-based insurance policies will be critical in the technology driven future.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • American drivers concerned about hacking of autonomous cars, says survey
    February 8, 2017
    An online survey by the University of Michigan Sustainable Worldwide Transportation Department asked American adults about their level of concern with cyber-security of personally owned autonomous vehicles (with and without driver controls) and current conventional vehicles looked at both vehicle security and data privacy. Within vehicle security, the issues examined were hacking vehicles to cause crashes, hacking by terrorists to use the vehicle as a weapon, disabling many vehicles simultaneously and di
  • OPINION: Pursuing transit-first policies is best way to cut car dependency
    April 3, 2023
    It's frustrating to see the UK’s new green strategy once again centre around EVs
  • Enforcement needs automation and communication
    February 1, 2012
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf
  • Deadlines approach for Europe’s automatic crash alert system
    September 15, 2016
    The EU-co-funded I_ HeERO (Infrastructure_ Harmonised eCall European Pilot) project is working to ensure the readiness of national networks of call centres - known as public safety answering posts (PSAPs) - to deal with automated crash alerts arriving via the continent-wide 112 emergency phone number. Following on from its HeERO and HeERO2 pre-deployment predecessors, which enjoyed €16m (US$17.76m) in EU funding, the new initiative runs from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017. It has €30.9 million (US$34.