Skip to main content

Future for connected cars ‘looks promising, but obstacles remain’

A new report released today by The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) highlights that the huge investment already going into research and development for connected vehicles is reaping rewards. However, several obstacles still remain – from privacy and security concerns, to a lack of infrastructure, the need for a legislative framework, issues around congestion and pollution and the very real threat from on-demand transport disruptors such as Uber and Lyft. Matt Kendall, telecoms analyst at The EIU, sa
October 19, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
A new report released today by The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) highlights that the huge investment already going into research and development for connected vehicles is reaping rewards. However, several obstacles still remain – from privacy and security concerns, to a lack of infrastructure, the need for a legislative framework, issues around congestion and pollution and the very real threat from on-demand transport disruptors such as 8336 Uber and Lyft.

Matt Kendall, telecoms analyst at The EIU, said: "In many respects, connected cars are already an embedded part of the current motoring environment, with many vehicles on our roads utilising connectedness in the form of GPS, infotainment and on-board vehicle diagnostics. However, the end game for the use of connectedness is the self-driving car, which is able to use connectivity to manoeuvre around, and interact with, its environment. But many obstacles to a fully autonomous future remain, and both the tech and auto industries are going to have to work hard, in a spirit of collaboration, to overcome them."

Connected cars are already generating huge amounts of data through on-board infotainment systems, as well as software platforms such as Google's Android Auto and Apple's CarPlay systems, which allow smartphone tethering to a vehicle. This is the current interpretation of connectedness within the automotive sector, but it is really self-driving vehicles that both carmakers and tech companies are focusing on over the long term.

But there are obstacles in the way. Firstly, autonomous vehicles will have to co-exist with driver-powered cars for some time, and they will have to be sophisticated enough to deal with pedestrians, cyclists, road furniture and other drivers.

There are ethical implications too; it is inevitable that autonomous vehicles will be involved in accidents in the future, and the decision-making patterns that a self-driving car may use to avoid them are complex. Governments will have to take a lead on developing a legislative framework within which autonomous cars can co-exist with both people and people-powered vehicles.

A more straightforward barrier is technological infrastructure. With the potential for millions of cars to generate huge amounts of data, both telecoms companies and governments will have to work to free up spectrum and develop greater network capacity. And with market disruptors such as Uber and Lyft working hard to eliminate the need for car ownership and deliver an on-demand service accessible to greater numbers of people, the demand for data, and the threat to carmakers, becomes even more apparent.

Nonetheless, connected cars are here to stay. Carmakers, tech companies and governments alike are embracing the transformative implications of having more connected cars and eventually, autonomous cars on the roads. The gains are potentially enormous and hint at the role autonomy could play in shaping travel and the very fabric of urban environments in a radically different way.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Give offending drivers credit for good behaviour
    July 27, 2012
    Andrew Rooke and Dave Marples of Technolution B.V. take a look at what can be done to address a long-standing problem: the all-or-nothing approach of automated enforcement. To start, a brief history of speeding: on 14 November 1896, the first Veteran Car Run was staged in England from London to Brighton. It was organised to celebrate new British legislation to raise the maximum speed of vehicles from four to 14mph while also removing the need for a person waving a red flag to walk in front of the car and wa
  • Towards common standards for cooperative road infrastructures
    July 23, 2012
    Michael Noblett of Connexis discusses international progress towards common standards for cooperative road infrastructures. Will vehicle safety communications standards be able to support ITS on the international level, or will we settle once again for regional interoperability only? The answer lies in the current status of the draft standards themselves, and the requirements users and authorities are placing on the people who draft them.
  • Do we need a new approach to ITS and traffic management?
    January 31, 2012
    In an article which has implications for the European Electronic Toll Service, ASECAP's Kallistratos Dionelis asks whether the approach we currently take to major ITS system implementations is always the best or healthiest. I was asked recently to write a paper on the technology-oriented future of transport. To paraphrase, I started with: "The goal of European policy-makers is to establish a transport system which meets society's economic, social and environmental needs, satisfying in parallel a rising dema
  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.