Skip to main content

Future for connected cars ‘looks promising, but obstacles remain’

A new report released today by The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) highlights that the huge investment already going into research and development for connected vehicles is reaping rewards. However, several obstacles still remain – from privacy and security concerns, to a lack of infrastructure, the need for a legislative framework, issues around congestion and pollution and the very real threat from on-demand transport disruptors such as Uber and Lyft. Matt Kendall, telecoms analyst at The EIU, sa
October 19, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
A new report released today by The Economist Intelligence Unit (The EIU) highlights that the huge investment already going into research and development for connected vehicles is reaping rewards. However, several obstacles still remain – from privacy and security concerns, to a lack of infrastructure, the need for a legislative framework, issues around congestion and pollution and the very real threat from on-demand transport disruptors such as 8336 Uber and Lyft.

Matt Kendall, telecoms analyst at The EIU, said: "In many respects, connected cars are already an embedded part of the current motoring environment, with many vehicles on our roads utilising connectedness in the form of GPS, infotainment and on-board vehicle diagnostics. However, the end game for the use of connectedness is the self-driving car, which is able to use connectivity to manoeuvre around, and interact with, its environment. But many obstacles to a fully autonomous future remain, and both the tech and auto industries are going to have to work hard, in a spirit of collaboration, to overcome them."

Connected cars are already generating huge amounts of data through on-board infotainment systems, as well as software platforms such as Google's Android Auto and Apple's CarPlay systems, which allow smartphone tethering to a vehicle. This is the current interpretation of connectedness within the automotive sector, but it is really self-driving vehicles that both carmakers and tech companies are focusing on over the long term.

But there are obstacles in the way. Firstly, autonomous vehicles will have to co-exist with driver-powered cars for some time, and they will have to be sophisticated enough to deal with pedestrians, cyclists, road furniture and other drivers.

There are ethical implications too; it is inevitable that autonomous vehicles will be involved in accidents in the future, and the decision-making patterns that a self-driving car may use to avoid them are complex. Governments will have to take a lead on developing a legislative framework within which autonomous cars can co-exist with both people and people-powered vehicles.

A more straightforward barrier is technological infrastructure. With the potential for millions of cars to generate huge amounts of data, both telecoms companies and governments will have to work to free up spectrum and develop greater network capacity. And with market disruptors such as Uber and Lyft working hard to eliminate the need for car ownership and deliver an on-demand service accessible to greater numbers of people, the demand for data, and the threat to carmakers, becomes even more apparent.

Nonetheless, connected cars are here to stay. Carmakers, tech companies and governments alike are embracing the transformative implications of having more connected cars and eventually, autonomous cars on the roads. The gains are potentially enormous and hint at the role autonomy could play in shaping travel and the very fabric of urban environments in a radically different way.

Related Content

  • December 23, 2015
    ITS sector must use less confusing industry terms says Q-Free
    For ITS to gain the recognition it deserves, Q-Free’s Knut Evensen argues that the sector must have a coherent message and avoid confusing the wider community with a bewildering array of terms and acronyms. Any industry or group of people will develop its own lexicon over time. The process is near-inevitable, as individuals’ knowledge bases increase and evolve, and terms for common wisdom are created and become truncated, or even slang. A danger, though, as a relatively small group looks to admit large numb
  • January 16, 2012
    Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • May 30, 2013
    Communication: the future of machine vision
    Jason Barnes asks leading machine vision industry figures what they consider to be the educational barriers to the technology’s increased uptake by the ITS sector. The recent rush by some organisations within the ITS sector to associate themselves with the term ‘machine vision’ underlines just how important the technology has become in a relatively short space of time. However, despite the technology having been applied in certain traffic management applications for some years, there remains a significant s
  • November 23, 2017
    Autumn budget: EV charging infrastructure fund and higher tax rates for diesel vehicles
    Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond has announced a £400m ($532m) charging infrastructure fund for electric vehicles (EVs), an extra £100m ($133m) investment in Plug-In-Car Grant, and a £40m ($53m) in charging R&D in the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017. He added that laws need to be clarified so that motorists who charge their EVs at work will not face a benefit-in-kind charge from next year.