Skip to main content

eCall mandate: a cost burden for car manufacturers?

The European Parliament has mandated that all newly approved car and light-van models will have to be equipped with eCall boxes as standard fitment from 31 March 2018. eCall boxes are emergency call devices enabling rescue services to respond with faster road assistance based on knowledge of the exact location of the accident. The 2014 ban on telephone roaming charges across Europe will establish a favourable scenario for an interoperable eCall or telematics solution. However, while the European Commissi
May 14, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The European Parliament has mandated that all newly approved car and light-van models will have to be equipped with eCall boxes as standard fitment from 31 March 2018. eCall boxes are emergency call devices enabling rescue services to respond with faster road assistance based on knowledge of the exact location of the accident.

The 2014 ban on telephone roaming charges across Europe will establish a favourable scenario for an interoperable eCall or telematics solution. However, while the 1690 European Commission stated that the installation of these devices will increase the cost of the vehicle by US$114, it remains to be seen whether European OEMs will be able to incur this cost and profit, says 2097 Frost & Sullivan.

While eCall has to be available free of cost for users, OEMS will have to convince consumers to pay more for a connected vehicle to absorb additional costs. According to Frost & Sullivan estimates, this can only be rolled out by offering connected services that will continue to operate on a subscription basis after the initial free period.

“OEMs will have to understand the potential revenue in installing such devices across vehicle lines,” says Frost & Sullivan Automotive & Transportation Program Manager, Niranjan Manohar. “Using a subscription-based business model will take harnessing vehicle data into the next generation of advanced services and tap into revenue potential of approximately US$14 billion. This will enable OEMs to lengthen customer relationships to over three years and tap into the potential of long-term maintenance and service business opportunities post vehicle sales.”

Even though safety is the most important driver for new vehicle purchases in Europe and the United States, the question of whether pre or post-crash assistance is necessary however, remains an issue. While consumers would like the implementation to come as a standard, adding to the overall perception of vehicle safety, the willingness to pay for it remains low.

As OEMs are most likely to bear the costs for implementing eCall in vehicles, they will focus on specific benefits and features that can secure some profit. Assessing possible opportunities within telematics ecosystems, service opportunities, and service value will be one of the ways forward. Cooperation among stakeholders could be another key to success for the integration of eCall.

While extremely popular in the US, the concept of subscription is not a favourable in Europe. Most OEMs with branded telematics services seek to profit by comparing subscription revenues to long-term customer retention opportunities as a result of the free trial period. European OEMs are not enthusiastic about the success of this model.

“It is essential however, that European OEMs modify their perspectives about eCall, as it will soon be a standard feature of vehicles,” warns Manohar. “Making eCall available as a key feature of a larger telematics service for instance, that focuses on Customer Relationship Management (CRM) services and prognostics (such as GM’s OnStar) is a possible solution for OEMs to adopt eCall. BMW is already offering free assistance and telematics services (diagnostics) for ten years with every vehicle purchased in the United States.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The trend in digital instrument displays
    March 23, 2012
    Innovative instrument clusters and head-up displays are becoming increasingly popular amongst OEMs and customers alike, according to IMS Research’s new automotive study, “The World Market for Automotive OEM Electronic Systems – 2011 Edition.”
  • Improved productivity and advanced technology benefits ITS
    December 13, 2012
    John Horsley will hang up his hat as executive director of AASHTO in February 2013. After 14 years at the helm, he will bow out convinced of the current and future benefits of ITS for US transportation. Alot of exciting career opportunities still await young engineers in US transportation, says John Horsley, outgoing executive director of AASHTO – the American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials. Horsley will be dedicating more of his time to matters of ITS after he stands down in Februa
  • Can GNSS solve the tolling world’s woes?
    December 5, 2013
    Kapsch’s Arno Klamminger and Wolfgang Fleischer consider the need for an agnostic approach to technology for charging and tolling. Periodically, given the march of technology, it is worth pausing and taking stock of where we have got to and where we go next. Such reflections are necessary if we are to take full advantage of what we have at our disposal and, potentially, avoid decisions which push us down technological culs de sac. A look at the use of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based technol
  • Aptiv: we need overhaul of AV nervous system
    August 20, 2019
    Autonomous vehicles are changing a lot of things: Aptiv’s Christian Schäfer suggests that we need to look again at traditional approaches to vehicle architecture to find viable options for the future