Skip to main content

eCall mandate: a cost burden for car manufacturers?

The European Parliament has mandated that all newly approved car and light-van models will have to be equipped with eCall boxes as standard fitment from 31 March 2018. eCall boxes are emergency call devices enabling rescue services to respond with faster road assistance based on knowledge of the exact location of the accident. The 2014 ban on telephone roaming charges across Europe will establish a favourable scenario for an interoperable eCall or telematics solution. However, while the European Commissi
May 14, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The European Parliament has mandated that all newly approved car and light-van models will have to be equipped with eCall boxes as standard fitment from 31 March 2018. eCall boxes are emergency call devices enabling rescue services to respond with faster road assistance based on knowledge of the exact location of the accident.

The 2014 ban on telephone roaming charges across Europe will establish a favourable scenario for an interoperable eCall or telematics solution. However, while the 1690 European Commission stated that the installation of these devices will increase the cost of the vehicle by US$114, it remains to be seen whether European OEMs will be able to incur this cost and profit, says 2097 Frost & Sullivan.

While eCall has to be available free of cost for users, OEMS will have to convince consumers to pay more for a connected vehicle to absorb additional costs. According to Frost & Sullivan estimates, this can only be rolled out by offering connected services that will continue to operate on a subscription basis after the initial free period.

“OEMs will have to understand the potential revenue in installing such devices across vehicle lines,” says Frost & Sullivan Automotive & Transportation Program Manager, Niranjan Manohar. “Using a subscription-based business model will take harnessing vehicle data into the next generation of advanced services and tap into revenue potential of approximately US$14 billion. This will enable OEMs to lengthen customer relationships to over three years and tap into the potential of long-term maintenance and service business opportunities post vehicle sales.”

Even though safety is the most important driver for new vehicle purchases in Europe and the United States, the question of whether pre or post-crash assistance is necessary however, remains an issue. While consumers would like the implementation to come as a standard, adding to the overall perception of vehicle safety, the willingness to pay for it remains low.

As OEMs are most likely to bear the costs for implementing eCall in vehicles, they will focus on specific benefits and features that can secure some profit. Assessing possible opportunities within telematics ecosystems, service opportunities, and service value will be one of the ways forward. Cooperation among stakeholders could be another key to success for the integration of eCall.

While extremely popular in the US, the concept of subscription is not a favourable in Europe. Most OEMs with branded telematics services seek to profit by comparing subscription revenues to long-term customer retention opportunities as a result of the free trial period. European OEMs are not enthusiastic about the success of this model.

“It is essential however, that European OEMs modify their perspectives about eCall, as it will soon be a standard feature of vehicles,” warns Manohar. “Making eCall available as a key feature of a larger telematics service for instance, that focuses on Customer Relationship Management (CRM) services and prognostics (such as GM’s OnStar) is a possible solution for OEMs to adopt eCall. BMW is already offering free assistance and telematics services (diagnostics) for ten years with every vehicle purchased in the United States.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Navigating a path towards greater safety
    May 31, 2013
    Eric Sampson takes a look at why the European Union’s eCall system is taking rather longer to arrive than it should. There’s an old story about the person who asked an Irishman for directions and after much thought he responded: “If you’re going there from here it would be better to start from somewhere else.” This came to mind when I was recently reflecting on eCall and wondering when it will come - some stakeholders say the answer is never. So despite years of workshops and discussions, eCall is still not
  • The move towards shared telematics platforms
    February 27, 2013
    Is the end for dedicated, in-vehicle telematics systems now in sight? Some seemed to think so at the recent Telematics Munich 2012 conference… Geoff Hadwick reports. Forget smartphone apps – leave that sort of thing to Apple and Google,” Roger Lanctot, associate director of the global automotive practice at consultancy Strategy Analytics told more than 700 delegates in Munich last month at the Telematics Munich 2012 conference. They are a waste of time and money, he said. Forget putting too much data on das
  • Improving driver information, making in-vehicle systems a reality
    January 26, 2012
    Scott J. McCormick, president of the Connected Vehicle Trade Association, considers what we have to do next to make the more widespread deployment of automotive telematics a reality
  • HeERO - harmonising e-Call across Europe
    March 1, 2013
    The second stage of the EC’s HeERO project, which aims to address some of the issues surrounding the eCall system, has just got underway. Jason Barnes reports. As the European Commission (EC)’s Har­monised eCall European Pilot (HeERO) project progresses into its second stage, ‘HeERO 2’, significant progress has already been made in addressing the technological and institutional issues relating to the pan-European deployment of an eCall system based around the new ‘112’ universal emergency telephone number.