Skip to main content

Continental gestures to a safer driving future

To improve non-verbal communication between drivers and their vehicles, Continental has devised a range of user-friendly touch gestures for the cockpit, using a combination of gesture interaction and touch screens. This enables drivers to draw specific, defined symbols on the input display to trigger a diverse array of functions and features for rapid access. According to Dr Heinz Abel, head of Cross Product Solutions at Continental’s Instrumentation and Driver HMI business unit, the use of gestures and
April 10, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
To improve non-verbal communication between drivers and their vehicles, 260 Continental has devised a range of user-friendly touch gestures for the cockpit, using a combination of gesture interaction and touch screens. This enables drivers to draw specific, defined symbols on the input display to trigger a diverse array of functions and features for rapid access.

According to Dr Heinz Abel, head of Cross Product Solutions at Continental’s Instrumentation and Driver HMI business unit, the use of gestures and system control through haptic methods allows drivers to access controls and functions much faster than with conventional control concepts involving buttons and switches. But there is still potential for drivers to get distracted. By combining both elements Continental believes it can significantly reduce levels of driver distraction compared with the standard method using a touch screen.

Drivers can enable touch gesture interaction simply by touching the display with two fingers, then use two fingers to draw a heart symbol to access a favourite contact or a house roof symbol telling the navigation system to drive home. By drawing a circle, the driver can turn on the air-conditioning system in his apartment. “To ensure that such concepts are accepted, it is important that the gestures used are intuitive and do not have to be specially learned. At the same time, it should be possible to draw the gestures without getting distracted from the task of driving and the gestures should be easy to remember. Current in-house user studies prove that we have succeeded on both counts,” says Dr Abel.

A lab study conducted by Continental showed that two-finger gestures can reduce the length of time required to call up the desired features and functions by around one third. Another result was that, compared with one-finger touch gestures, two-finger touch gestures reduced the mental effort involved in operation to around one quarter.

Two-finger touch gestures can be drawn anywhere on the touch-sensitive surface of the input display, with drivers hardly having to avert their eyes from the road; this ensures intuitive and user-friendly operation. At the same time, this concept extends the conventional human–machine dialogue by allowing users to create favourites that can be accessed directly at the first menu level.

Related Content

  • June 3, 2015
    Distraction dominated teen driver accident causes.
    As a new report shows that distracted driving is a bigger cause of accidents than previously thought, Jon Masters asks what should be done to counter this problem. Research carried out by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has shed new light on the dangers of distraction for teen drivers. Six years of study using video analysis has shown that 58% of all crashes involving teen drivers are caused by the driver being distracted and proved that the influence of external factors is stronger than previously th
  • January 30, 2012
    Road design as a primary aid to speed enforcement?
    Letty Aarts, senior researcher, SWOV institute for road safety research, the Netherlands, discusses how road design can act as a primary aid to speed enforcement
  • October 7, 2021
    Revealed: future of mobility in Hamburg
    From 11-15 October, the ITS World Congress will present a myriad of innovations
  • December 4, 2012
    Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t