Skip to main content

Consumer Watchdog calls on NHTSA to strength rules on autonomous cars

The US Consumer Watchdog has called on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require a steering wheel, brake and accelerator so a human driver can take control of a self-driving robot car when necessary in the guidelines it is developing on automated vehicle technology. In comments for a NHTSA public meeting about automated vehicle technology, John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's privacy project director, also listed ten questions he said the agency must ask Google about its self-
April 11, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
The US Consumer Watchdog has called on the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to require a steering wheel, brake and accelerator so a human driver can take control of a self-driving robot car when necessary in the guidelines it is developing on automated vehicle technology.

In comments for a NHTSA public meeting about automated vehicle technology, John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's privacy project director, also listed ten questions he said the agency must ask Google about its self-driving robot car program.

These include, amongst others: whether Google will agree to publish its software algorithms, including how the company's artificial car intelligence will be programmed to decide what happens in the event of a potential collision; whether Google will publish a complete list of real-life situations, such as police hand signals, the cars cannot yet understand and how it intends to deal with them; how Google will prove that self-driving cars are safer than today's vehicles; does Google have the technology to prevent malicious hackers from seizing control of a driverless vehicle or any of its systems.

"Deploying a vehicle today without a steering wheel, brake, accelerator and a human driver capable of intervening when something goes wrong is not merely foolhardy.  It is dangerous," said Simpson. "NHTSA's autonomous vehicle guidelines must reflect this fact."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Comment: ‘Sleepwalk into a new dawn? No thanks’
    October 19, 2021
    We need a grown-up discussion about the possible societal effects of driverless vehicles
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 1, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become. ITS Stockholm in 2009 and the Cooperative Mobility Showcase event which took place alongside Intertraffic in Amsterdam in March this year both featured live, on-street demonstrations of safety and driver information applications that used Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications,
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 6, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become
  • The need to accelerate systems standardisation
    January 31, 2012
    While the US has achieved an appreciable level of success when it comes to implementation of standards-based systems at the urban and intersection control levels, the overall standards implementation effort is not progressing at anywhere near a level commensurate with the size of the country and its population, says Christy Peebles, business unit manager with Siemens Industry, Inc.'s Mobility Division. She attributes the situation to a number of factors: "There's a big element of 'Not Invented Here' syndro