Skip to main content

California grants Uber driverless car permit, releases autonomous vehicle regulations

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has issued Uber with another permit to put its driverless cars back on the state’s roads, according to Reuters. Obtaining the permit also marks a concession for Uber, which had fought California regulators over the requirement and initially refused to apply for the US$150 permit. Following a disagreement with regulators last December when Uber argued that its cars do not meet the state's definition of an autonomous vehicle because they require constant mo
March 13, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has issued 8336 Uber with another permit to put its driverless cars back on the state’s roads, according to Reuters. Obtaining the permit also marks a concession for Uber, which had fought California regulators over the requirement and initially refused to apply for the US$150 permit.

Following a disagreement with regulators last December when Uber argued that its cars do not meet the state's definition of an autonomous vehicle because they require constant monitoring by a person, Uber moved its self-driving cars from San Francisco to Arizona, a state with fewer regulations for autonomous vehicles.

Simultaneously, the DMV has released proposed regulations to establish a path for testing and future deployment of fully autonomous vehicles without drivers.

The department received substantial feedback from manufacturers, consumer advocates, local government, insurance companies and other stakeholders after it released revised draft regulations for testing without a driver and the deployment of autonomous vehicles in September 2016.  

The proposed regulations address public safety concerns while recognising the potential of autonomous technology to improve safety, enhance mobility and encourage innovation.  Under the proposed regulations manufacturers would need to certify to the state that their own testing shows the cars are ready to operate on public roads without a driver. Tests with no driver would require an operator monitoring the car, ready to steer via remote control if necessary.

Manufacturers who want to deploy cars without a steering wheel and pedals would require the approval of federal highway safety officials.

“These rules expand our existing autonomous vehicle testing program to include testing vehicles where no driver is present,” said DMV Director Jean Shiomoto. “This is the next step in eventually allowing driverless autonomous vehicles on California roadways.”

Related Content

  • March 20, 2018
    Uber’s autonomous taxi kills pedestrian, North American trials suspended
    An autonomous car operated by Uber has killed a pedestrian in what is believed to be the first death of its kind, in a report by The Independent. The vehicle, according to Tempe Police, was driving in autonomous mode as part of the company’s North America tests that included an operator behind the wheel that was not in control at the time of the incident. Uber Technologies has suspended all of its driverless car tests in Phoenix and Arizona as well as Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Toronto.
  • September 10, 2014
    Autonomous cars just years from reality says Verizon CEO
    The technology exists to make self-driving cars an emerging reality in the next three to five years - if the country will build the infrastructure and the government will issue the necessary rules, the CEO of wireless communications company Verizon told the Detroit Economic Club on Monday. His comments, reported by the Detroit News, came the day after the announcement that Michigan will install cameras and sensors along 120 miles of Detroit freeways to connect cars wirelessly to highways and each other.
  • February 22, 2021
    Uber drivers are 'workers', say lawmakers
    UK Supreme Court decision could disrupt ride-hailing giant's business model in London
  • February 1, 2012
    Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d