Skip to main content

Belfast and Bristol ‘most congested cities in UK’

According to the 2012 Congestion Index from satellite navigation specialists TomTom, motorists in Bristol and Belfast now face the slowest moving traffic in Britain. Even London’s infamous rush hour is less congested than peak-time jams in cities like Manchester and Nottingham, the annual global traffic figures found. The index shows that the average journey for drivers in Belfast takes 32.1 per cent longer than it would do if traffic moved freely, while in Bristol, journeys take 31 per cent longer. Londo
April 5, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
According to the 2012 Congestion Index from satellite navigation specialists 1692 TomTom, motorists in Bristol and Belfast now face the slowest moving traffic in Britain.  Even London’s infamous rush hour is less congested than peak-time jams in cities like Manchester and Nottingham, the annual global traffic figures found.

The index shows that the average journey for drivers in Belfast takes 32.1 per cent longer than it would do if traffic moved freely, while in Bristol, journeys take 31 per cent longer.  London is only third on the overall list, where the congestion charge has helped improve speeds so that a typical journey takes 27.5 per cent longer than it should.

But that is nothing compared to rush hour speeds says TomTom, which bases its annual report on an incredible five billion pieces of data fed to it every day.

In Belfast, traffic crawls along so slowly that a peak time journey takes a mind-numbing 71-72 per cent longer than a normal trip.  In Bristol it is 56 per cent longer in the mornings but a frustrating 64 per cent slower in the evening.  In other words, a journey that should take an hour takes 98 minutes.

London's morning rush hour is 56 per cent longer and its evening traffic flows are 55 per cent worse, but that's a better journey than those in Leeds/Bradford and Manchester for instance.

However, for any British drivers thinking they have it bad, be glad you are not trying to commute in the Russian or Turkish capitals.

TomTom's data from 161 cities worldwide throughout 2012 shows Moscow motorists have the worst traffic jams on the planet.   The average journey is a painstaking 66 per cent slower than it should be, in Istanbul it is 55 per cent and in Warsaw, 42 per cent.

Marseille, Palermo, Paris, Rome, Stuttgart, Sydney and Los Angeles are all worse for drivers than anywhere in Britain, according to the TomTom Congestion Index.

The figures are regularly used to help local authorities plan their transport policy said the firm's head of traffic, Ralf-Peter Schafer.  He said: "This detailed knowledge of the entire road network, helps businesses and governments make more informed decisions about how best to tackle and avoid congestion.  Our traffic database contains over six trillion data measurements. This helps us determine which routes are the least busy and what times of day are best."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Russia 2018 World Cup: ITS can win it
    June 5, 2018
    Teams and supporters will cover vast distances in Russia for the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Stephane Clauss from Sony Europe’s Image Sensing Solutions division examines how the latest camera technologies can be deployed to help things run smoothly over the next month or so... For one month, from June 14, Russia is hosting the 2018 FIFA World Cup. This is the largest country in the world and the distances between venues will be larger than at almost any other World Cup - bar the finals in the US and Brazil.
  • Virtual traffic management centres, a new direction in traffic monitoring
    January 30, 2012
    David Crawford picks up a new direction trend in traffic monitoring The surprise winner in the Traffic Management Centre (TMC) category of the recently-announced 2011 OSMOSE (Open Source for MObile and SustainablE city) Awards for European innovations in urban transport, is the Danish city of Aalborg - which doesn't have a TMC. Alternatively, one might consider its 'virtual' TMC as a signpost for the future in medium-sized cities.
  • AV technology ‘could reduce congestion’, says Australian minister
    February 26, 2019
    Congestion costs would drop by more than a quarter if automated vehicles (AVs) account for 30% of kilometres travelled, says Alan Tudge, Australia’s minister for cites urban infrastructure and population. Speaking at the Australia-New Zealand Cities Symposium in Sydney, Tudge revealed findings from the Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics. “They estimate it would drop from $37 billion of avoidable congestion to $27 billion,” Tudge says. A 30km freeway journey in Melbourne has increas
  • Motorists want roads repaired before smart motorways, says survey
    December 5, 2014
    According to research by Bury-based online car supermarket JamJar Direct, which indicates that 47 per cent of Greater Manchester motorists claim to have been affected by the construction works, communications around the M60 smart motorway improvements are sorely lacking. Almost two thirds of Greater Manchester motorists (62 per cent) are aware that the M60 is being turned into a smart motorway, but over 40 per cent, equivalent to 81,000 vehicles per day using affected stretch of M60 between junctions 8 a