Skip to main content

Belfast and Bristol ‘most congested cities in UK’

According to the 2012 Congestion Index from satellite navigation specialists TomTom, motorists in Bristol and Belfast now face the slowest moving traffic in Britain. Even London’s infamous rush hour is less congested than peak-time jams in cities like Manchester and Nottingham, the annual global traffic figures found. The index shows that the average journey for drivers in Belfast takes 32.1 per cent longer than it would do if traffic moved freely, while in Bristol, journeys take 31 per cent longer. Londo
April 5, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
According to the 2012 Congestion Index from satellite navigation specialists 1692 TomTom, motorists in Bristol and Belfast now face the slowest moving traffic in Britain.  Even London’s infamous rush hour is less congested than peak-time jams in cities like Manchester and Nottingham, the annual global traffic figures found.

The index shows that the average journey for drivers in Belfast takes 32.1 per cent longer than it would do if traffic moved freely, while in Bristol, journeys take 31 per cent longer.  London is only third on the overall list, where the congestion charge has helped improve speeds so that a typical journey takes 27.5 per cent longer than it should.

But that is nothing compared to rush hour speeds says TomTom, which bases its annual report on an incredible five billion pieces of data fed to it every day.

In Belfast, traffic crawls along so slowly that a peak time journey takes a mind-numbing 71-72 per cent longer than a normal trip.  In Bristol it is 56 per cent longer in the mornings but a frustrating 64 per cent slower in the evening.  In other words, a journey that should take an hour takes 98 minutes.

London's morning rush hour is 56 per cent longer and its evening traffic flows are 55 per cent worse, but that's a better journey than those in Leeds/Bradford and Manchester for instance.

However, for any British drivers thinking they have it bad, be glad you are not trying to commute in the Russian or Turkish capitals.

TomTom's data from 161 cities worldwide throughout 2012 shows Moscow motorists have the worst traffic jams on the planet.   The average journey is a painstaking 66 per cent slower than it should be, in Istanbul it is 55 per cent and in Warsaw, 42 per cent.

Marseille, Palermo, Paris, Rome, Stuttgart, Sydney and Los Angeles are all worse for drivers than anywhere in Britain, according to the TomTom Congestion Index.

The figures are regularly used to help local authorities plan their transport policy said the firm's head of traffic, Ralf-Peter Schafer.  He said: "This detailed knowledge of the entire road network, helps businesses and governments make more informed decisions about how best to tackle and avoid congestion.  Our traffic database contains over six trillion data measurements. This helps us determine which routes are the least busy and what times of day are best."

Related Content

  • February 1, 2012
    Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is
  • July 19, 2018
    Cost benefit: Toronto retimings tame traffic trauma
    Canada’s largest city reckons that it is saving its taxpayers’ money simply by altering the way traffic lights work. David Crawford reviews Toronto’s ambitious plans to ease congestion Toronto, Canada’s largest metropolis (and the fourth largest in North America), has saved its residents CAN$53 (US$42.4) for every CAN$1 (US$0.80) spent over a 2012-2016 traffic signal retiming programme, according to figures released by its Transportation Services Division. The programme covered 1,275 signals (the city’s
  • August 24, 2023
    'Follow signs - not satnav' says National Highways to music fans
    Traffic management helps gig-goers get to see Billie Eilish and The Killers at Leeds Festival
  • July 11, 2018
    Cost benefit: Toronto retimings tame traffic trauma
    Canada’s largest city reckons that it is saving its taxpayers’ money simply by altering the way traffic lights work. David Crawford reviews Toronto’s ambitious plans to ease congestion. Toronto, Canada’s largest metropolis (and the fourth largest in North America), has saved its residents CAN$53 (US$42.4) for every CAN$1 (US$0.80) spent over a 2012-2016 traffic signal retiming programme, according to figures released by its Transportation Services Division. The programme covered 1,275 signals (the city’s to