Skip to main content

Autonomous car data released

California’s Autonomous Vehicle Testing Regulations require every manufacturer authorised to test autonomous vehicles (AV) on public roads to submit an annual report summarising the disengagements, or deactivation of the autonomous mode, of the technology during testing. Eleven manufacturers are currently testing autonomous vehicles on the state’s roads, seven of which (VW/Audi, Mercedes Benz, Google, Delphi Automotive, Tesla Motors, Bosch, and Nissan) were required to submit their first disengagement re
January 14, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
California’s Autonomous Vehicle Testing Regulations require every manufacturer authorised to test autonomous vehicles (AV) on public roads to submit an annual report summarising the disengagements, or deactivation of the autonomous mode, of the technology during testing.

Eleven manufacturers are currently testing autonomous vehicles on the state’s roads, seven of which (VW/2125 Audi, 1685 Mercedes Benz, 1691 Google, 7207 Delphi Automotive, 597 Tesla Motors, 311 Bosch, and 838 Nissan) were required to submit their first disengagement reports by 1 January 2016.  

Bosch, which tested two vehicles over 942 miles, reported 625 disengagements, but claimed all were ‘planned technology tests’.

Delphi’s two cars drove a total of 16,662 miles and reported around 397 disengagements. 28 of these cases had been precautionary, because of nearby pedestrians or cyclists, and 212 had been due to difficulties making out road markings or traffic lights

In 1,485 miles, Nissan’s four vehicles recorded 106 disengagements, mainly to avoid being rear-ended or rear-ending another vehicle, or due to AV system failure.

Mercedes’ two vehicles reported 529 disengagements in 1,379 miles, mainly because the driver was uncomfortable with the software’s behaviour

Tesla reported no disengagements.

Volkswagen tested two vehicles, which drove 14,945 miles and reported 260 disengagements due to watchdog error or ‘basic vehicle requirements not being satisfied’.

Google’s fleet of cars drove a total of 424,331 miles on public roads, reporting 272 disengagements where the vehicle’s software detected a failure and a further 69 where the driver took control of the vehicle because he perceived a safety threat.

Non-profit public interest group Consumer Watchdog called on Google to release any videos of the incidents, as well as technical data gathered immediately preceding the disengagements.

“The DMV got it exactly right and is putting our safety first,” said privacy project director John M. Simpson. “How can Google propose a car with no steering wheel, brakes or driver when its own tests show that over 15 months the robot technology failed and handed control to the driver 272 times and a test driver felt compelled to intervene 69 times?

“Release of the disengagement report was a positive step, but Google should also make public any video it has of the disengagement incidents, as well as any technical data it collected so we can fully understand what went wrong as it uses our public roads as its private laboratory,” Simpson said.

In its report, Google claims that the number of autonomous miles being driven between manual control disengagements is increasing steadily over time, from 785 miles per disengagement in the fourth quarter of 2014 to 5,218 miles per disengagement in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Four other manufacturers (Cruise Automation, 1731 BMW, 1683 Honda, and 278 Ford) are due to submit their first disengagement report by the beginning of January 2017.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Tesla Autopilot system ‘not at fault’ in fatal crash
    January 24, 2017
    A nine-month investigation by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) into the fatal car crash involving a Tesla Model S in Florida last year has concluded that the car’s Autopilot system, which was in operation at the time, was not at fault. The decision noted that Autopilot is a Level 2 self-driving system and, therefore, requires the driver to always monitor the system and be at the ready to intervene – a stipulation that the driver failed to perform, the administration says.
  • Tesla crash in China puts autonomous cars in the spotlight again
    August 11, 2016
    Tesla is investigating the crash in Beijing, China last week, when a Tesla Model S in autopilot mode hit the side of a parked car. According to Reuters, Tesla said it had reviewed data to confirm the car was in autopilot mode, a system that takes control of steering and braking in certain conditions. Tesla also said it was the driver's responsibility to maintain control of the vehicle. In this case, it said, the driver's hands were not detected on the steering wheel. "The driver of the Tesla, whose h
  • Elon Musk’s underground movement
    August 3, 2020
    The Boring Company is building tunnels under various US cities – but for what? Kristina Smith delves deep into a project which may (eventually) have real appeal for mass transit providers and transportation agencies
  • Four drivers a month deliberately ignore Manchester motorway closures
    December 9, 2016
    Highways England is urging drivers Highways England is not to put road workers’ lives at risk by deliberately ignoring road closures on the M60 and M62 near Manchester. New figures have revealed that four drivers a month are entering closed sections of road in the Manchester smart motorway scheme to either overtake traffic on the motorway or avoid using diversion routes. Highways England has released CCTV footage showing a driver ignoring an overnight slip road closure at junction 11 of the M60 at Ecc