Skip to main content

Autonomous car data released

California’s Autonomous Vehicle Testing Regulations require every manufacturer authorised to test autonomous vehicles (AV) on public roads to submit an annual report summarising the disengagements, or deactivation of the autonomous mode, of the technology during testing. Eleven manufacturers are currently testing autonomous vehicles on the state’s roads, seven of which (VW/Audi, Mercedes Benz, Google, Delphi Automotive, Tesla Motors, Bosch, and Nissan) were required to submit their first disengagement re
January 14, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
California’s Autonomous Vehicle Testing Regulations require every manufacturer authorised to test autonomous vehicles (AV) on public roads to submit an annual report summarising the disengagements, or deactivation of the autonomous mode, of the technology during testing.

Eleven manufacturers are currently testing autonomous vehicles on the state’s roads, seven of which (VW/2125 Audi, 1685 Mercedes Benz, 1691 Google, 7207 Delphi Automotive, 597 Tesla Motors, 311 Bosch, and 838 Nissan) were required to submit their first disengagement reports by 1 January 2016.  

Bosch, which tested two vehicles over 942 miles, reported 625 disengagements, but claimed all were ‘planned technology tests’.

Delphi’s two cars drove a total of 16,662 miles and reported around 397 disengagements. 28 of these cases had been precautionary, because of nearby pedestrians or cyclists, and 212 had been due to difficulties making out road markings or traffic lights

In 1,485 miles, Nissan’s four vehicles recorded 106 disengagements, mainly to avoid being rear-ended or rear-ending another vehicle, or due to AV system failure.

Mercedes’ two vehicles reported 529 disengagements in 1,379 miles, mainly because the driver was uncomfortable with the software’s behaviour

Tesla reported no disengagements.

Volkswagen tested two vehicles, which drove 14,945 miles and reported 260 disengagements due to watchdog error or ‘basic vehicle requirements not being satisfied’.

Google’s fleet of cars drove a total of 424,331 miles on public roads, reporting 272 disengagements where the vehicle’s software detected a failure and a further 69 where the driver took control of the vehicle because he perceived a safety threat.

Non-profit public interest group Consumer Watchdog called on Google to release any videos of the incidents, as well as technical data gathered immediately preceding the disengagements.

“The DMV got it exactly right and is putting our safety first,” said privacy project director John M. Simpson. “How can Google propose a car with no steering wheel, brakes or driver when its own tests show that over 15 months the robot technology failed and handed control to the driver 272 times and a test driver felt compelled to intervene 69 times?

“Release of the disengagement report was a positive step, but Google should also make public any video it has of the disengagement incidents, as well as any technical data it collected so we can fully understand what went wrong as it uses our public roads as its private laboratory,” Simpson said.

In its report, Google claims that the number of autonomous miles being driven between manual control disengagements is increasing steadily over time, from 785 miles per disengagement in the fourth quarter of 2014 to 5,218 miles per disengagement in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Four other manufacturers (Cruise Automation, 1731 BMW, 1683 Honda, and 278 Ford) are due to submit their first disengagement report by the beginning of January 2017.

Related Content

  • September 8, 2014
    Xerox a founding partner in connected vehicle initiative
    Xerox joins a select group of companies, including Econolite, Iteris, Delphi, Denso, Bosch, Honda, Nissan, Toyota and General Motors, which will be the founding partners in the University of Michigan’s Mobility Transformation Center (MTC). Spanning such sectors as auto manufacturing, suppliers, ITS, insurance, telecommunications, data management, and mobility services, the MTC’s Leadership Circle will join with government and academic partners to lay the foundations for a commercially viable system of co
  • January 29, 2016
    Front crash prevention slashes police-reported rear-end crashes, says IIHS
    Vehicles equipped with front crash prevention are much less likely to rear-end other vehicles, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has found in the first study of the feature's effectiveness using US police-reported crash data. The study found that systems with automatic braking reduce rear-end crashes by about 40 per cent on average, while forward collision warning alone cuts them by 23 per cent. The automatic braking systems also greatly reduce injury crashes.
  • December 11, 2020
    Gridserve unveils 'mass charging' EV forecourt
    Company says it can charge 36 EVs at once, adding 200 miles of range in 20 minutes
  • October 22, 2018
    Grey areas: who's legally responsible for C/AVs?
    Connected and autonomous vehicles are an exciting development in the ITS sector – but amid the hype some big questions about their deployment remain unanswered, finds Ben Spencer Connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AVs) have the potential to change the way we travel - and to eliminate road fatalities. But policy makers and regulators will need to ensure user and public safety is included in future planning. The legal and insurance industries will have to catch up, too. For example, questions over who is