Skip to main content

Autonomous car accidents revealed in California

Associated Press (AP) recently reported that three of Google's self-driving cars have been involved in accidents since September, when California allowed them to begin using public roads. The parts supplier Delphi Automotive had one accident, which an accident report the company provided to AP showed was not its fault. Delphi said at the time the car was being driven by the person the DMV requires behind the wheel during testing. US consumer rights advocate Consumer Watchdog has now called on Google
May 13, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
Associated Press (AP) recently reported that three of 1691 Google's self-driving cars have been involved in accidents since September, when California allowed them to begin using public roads.

The parts supplier 7207 Delphi Automotive had one accident, which an accident report the company provided to AP showed was not its fault. Delphi said at the time the car was being driven by the person the DMV requires behind the wheel during testing.

US consumer rights advocate Consumer Watchdog has now called on Google to release the reports of accidents involving its driverless cars and to commit to making public all future driverless car accident reports.  

It learned that there had been accidents involving Google's robot cars when it filed a Public Records Act request with the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) seeking communications between Google and the department. However, the DMV treats driverless car accident reports confidentially and would not release them.

"It is important that the public know what happened," wrote John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Privacy Project director, in a letter to Google. "You are testing driverless vehicles on public highways, quite possibly putting other drivers at risk."

Chris Urmson, director of Google's self-driving car program, says 11 accidents in 1.7 million miles is a lot better record than most humans achieve.

Writing in a blog post, he says, “If you spend enough time on the road, accidents will happen whether you’re in a car or a self-driving car. Over the six years since we started the project, we’ve been involved in 11 minor accidents (light damage, no injuries) during those 1.7 million miles of autonomous and manual driving with our safety drivers behind the wheel, and not once was the self-driving car the cause of the accident.”

"Rear-end crashes are the most frequent accidents in America, and often there’s little the driver in front can do to avoid getting hit; we’ve been hit from behind seven times, mainly at traffic lights but also on the freeway," he said. "We’ve also been side-swiped a couple of times and hit by a car rolling through a stop sign. ... We have a detailed review process and try to learn something from each incident, even if it hasn’t been our fault.

“Not only are we developing a good understanding of minor accident rates on suburban streets, we’ve also identified patterns of driver behaviour (lane-drifting, red-light running) that are leading indicators of significant collisions.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Lack of communication jeopardises road weather information
    February 3, 2012
    A lack of communications means that the case for more widespread use of road weather information systems is still not happening, says Vaisala's Jon Tarleton. More effective exchanges up and down the political scale are needed, he adds
  • AAA camera research finds 46 per cent improvement in blind-zone visibility
    October 31, 2014
    Tests carried out by the American Automobile Association (AAA) on rear-view camera systems found that they improved rear visibility an average of 46 per cent. These systems are intended to improve driver awareness of the area immediately behind the vehicle in order to reduce the instance of back-over fatalities. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration requires a rear-view image in all passenger vehicles beginning in 2016, with full compliance by May 2018. In conjunction with the Automobile Clu
  • Smart Cities put people, prudence and businesses before technology
    December 4, 2014
    Caroline Haynes tells ITS International that transport planners and equipment suppliers need to adopt different thinking and the smartest cities don’t call themselves smart. The term Smart Cities has been around for some time and has become something of a catch-all term applied to novel or futuristic technology deployed in an urban setting.
  • Polarised imaging gives enforcement clarity
    February 6, 2020
    Polarised imaging advances have finally allowed ITS technology to catch up with previously unenforceable international bans on smoking in cars, says Sony’s Stephane Clauss