Skip to main content

Autonomous car accidents revealed in California

Associated Press (AP) recently reported that three of Google's self-driving cars have been involved in accidents since September, when California allowed them to begin using public roads. The parts supplier Delphi Automotive had one accident, which an accident report the company provided to AP showed was not its fault. Delphi said at the time the car was being driven by the person the DMV requires behind the wheel during testing. US consumer rights advocate Consumer Watchdog has now called on Google
May 13, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
Associated Press (AP) recently reported that three of 1691 Google's self-driving cars have been involved in accidents since September, when California allowed them to begin using public roads.

The parts supplier 7207 Delphi Automotive had one accident, which an accident report the company provided to AP showed was not its fault. Delphi said at the time the car was being driven by the person the DMV requires behind the wheel during testing.

US consumer rights advocate Consumer Watchdog has now called on Google to release the reports of accidents involving its driverless cars and to commit to making public all future driverless car accident reports.  

It learned that there had been accidents involving Google's robot cars when it filed a Public Records Act request with the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) seeking communications between Google and the department. However, the DMV treats driverless car accident reports confidentially and would not release them.

"It is important that the public know what happened," wrote John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Privacy Project director, in a letter to Google. "You are testing driverless vehicles on public highways, quite possibly putting other drivers at risk."

Chris Urmson, director of Google's self-driving car program, says 11 accidents in 1.7 million miles is a lot better record than most humans achieve.

Writing in a blog post, he says, “If you spend enough time on the road, accidents will happen whether you’re in a car or a self-driving car. Over the six years since we started the project, we’ve been involved in 11 minor accidents (light damage, no injuries) during those 1.7 million miles of autonomous and manual driving with our safety drivers behind the wheel, and not once was the self-driving car the cause of the accident.”

"Rear-end crashes are the most frequent accidents in America, and often there’s little the driver in front can do to avoid getting hit; we’ve been hit from behind seven times, mainly at traffic lights but also on the freeway," he said. "We’ve also been side-swiped a couple of times and hit by a car rolling through a stop sign. ... We have a detailed review process and try to learn something from each incident, even if it hasn’t been our fault.

“Not only are we developing a good understanding of minor accident rates on suburban streets, we’ve also identified patterns of driver behaviour (lane-drifting, red-light running) that are leading indicators of significant collisions.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • California self-driving car rules ‘perplexing’
    December 21, 2015
    California’s Department of Motor vehicles (DMV) has issued its draft self-driving vehicle deployment regulations, which, according to Google’s self-driving car chief, Chris Urmson, are perplexing. The DMV has proposed a draft rule that would require a self-driving car to have a licensed driver at all times. Urmson says that while this maintains the same old status quo, it falls short on allowing this technology to reach its full potential, while excluding those who need to get around but cannot drive.
  • Ignoring deadly defects in autonomous cars serves no one, say auto safety advocates
    July 29, 2016
    The US Center for Auto Safety, Consumer Watchdog and former National Highway Traffic Administration (NHTSA) administrator Joan Claybrook have told NHTSA administrator Mark Rosekind that "you inexcusably are rushing full speed ahead" to promote the deployment of self-driving robot car technology instead of developing adequate safety standards "crucial to ensuring imperfect technologies do not kill people by being introduced into vehicles before the technology matures." In a letter to Rosekind in response
  • Redflex: ‘Consistency of enforcement will drive compliance’
    August 7, 2020
    Mark Talbot, CEO of Redflex Holdings, puts himself in the ITS International hotseat to answer questions about leveraging technology, MaaS changes and new areas of business
  • DSRC? ‘It’s become a faith-based thing’
    March 2, 2021
    The US FCC’s decision on 5.9GHz led to Applied Information offering DSRC buybacks to DoTs. Bryan Mulligan tells Adam Hill that we now just need to get on and roll out CV technology...