 
     David Crawford looks at the latest developments in emergency response.
     
Ensuring speedier reactions to transport and travel crises is becoming increasingly important. US statistics suggest that as many as 1,000 ‘saveable’ lives can be lost each year in major cities because of operational defects in their SOS operations.
     
At the most basic level, improving emergency management and response can be a matter of integrating agencies and equipment for greater effectiveness. In June 2014, for example, the US city of Boston rolled out a US$15 million map-based ‘visually-aware’ computer-aided dispatch CAD system. 
     
Supplied by geospatial software developer 
     
It geocodes incoming calls on a display that also shows the nearest units to an incident, allowing dispatchers to scan them for appropriateness, eg in a potentially dangerous situation. 
     
Nationwide, the US has some 6,100 public safety answering posts (emergency call centres known collectively as PSAPs) handling 240 million calls a year – one third from mobile phones. Their role in dealing with road traffic accidents and other transport crises is heading for a major technological uplift.  
 
A 2011 report sponsored by the US Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technologies Administration concluded that: “The devices and technologies people use to communicate with one another are growing, in both number and complexity, faster than the legacy 9-1-1 system’s ability to keep up.”
In response, the US is now rolling  out its next generation 9-1-1, to replace  existing narrowband networks  that carry only limited (mainly voice) data. 
     
Some  US States have implemented next generation 9-1-1 and more than half the  country is moving towards the situation where, as a starting point, any  smartphone user (including a driver) with SMS capability can text an  appropriately equipped PSAP (most are still currently voice-centred).   
     
“Progress  has been slow,” Roger Hixson, technical issues director of the US  National Emergency Number Association (NENA) told ITS International.  “But it is speeding up.” He expects next generation 9-1-1 to be “fairly  ubiquitous within five years”. 
     
The  four major US telecoms companies that handle 9-1-1 calls - 
     
But  texting is just the beginning, says Sid McConahy, director of  operations at US public safety consultants Mission Critical Partners  (MCP), which advises administrations on issues such as broadband  deployment and 9-1-1 operational analysis. “Next generation 9-1-1 is a  journey. The PSAP environment will continually evolve with new  technologies, processes and expectations,” he said. 
 
Hixson looks forward to smartphones being able to send detailed information, including video and photos as well as telematics data from a crash site (or crime scene), via a PSAP direct to 9-1-1 dispatchers. Much of this the PSAP could trigger “as deemed appropriate”, he says, and depending on the telematics capability of the vehicle.
PSAPs could, in turn, send key data direct to a field responder such as an emergency medical technician. They would then be adequately briefed while en route to an incident on essential facts; and relevant data could also be sent to a trauma centre prior to a victim’s arrival.
One  US technology company is already envisaging commercial prospects in   this direction. California-based Location Labs, which Dutch mobile   security group AVG recently bought for US$220 million, distributes its   technology through the four large US wireless carriers. 
     
It   already allows users to, for instance, track family members and   automatically lock down mobile phones to prevent driver distraction and   so reduce the risk of accidents. Its Drive Safe app uses motion   detection to determine if a phone is moving at more than 16km/h (10mph).   Once it hits this speed, an automatic lock restricts access to only   three whitelisted contacts and three whitelisted apps, as chosen by the   user who can override to reach 9-1-1. The next step could be to  transmit  the photos and location data needed by emergency responders. 
Says  founder and CEO Tasso Roumeliotis: “Smartphones  are very much underused  as safety devices. They know exactly where you  are because of wi-fi and  GPS.”
     
Meanwhile,  the US  government-funded First Responder Network Authority, or  FirstNet, is  moving slowly towards its aim of providing a nationwide  interoperable  wireless broadband network that will connect all the  nation’s 5.4  million first responders. 
     
They would then no longer have to rely on commercial carriers to communicate critical information.
     
An   independent agency sitting within the US National Telecommunications   and Information Administration (NTIA), FirstNet is not intended to   replace the existing system. Hixson welcomes the initiative, and looks   forward to “integrating operationally with it”. 
     
He   also sees scope in the US for civilian versions of the aerostat   miniature balloon, originally developed for surveillance by US forces   operating in Afghanistan. The concept involves a mobile aerial platform,   capable of rapid launch, which can lift a lightweight camera and 4G   base station over 300m into the air and communicate over a 75km radius. 
 
In a major incident, it could replace normal terrestrial communications infrastructure that has been destroyed or diminished to link up with ground-level video cameras and stream content to traffic or emergency control centres enabling them to base their responses on visual evidence. Claimed quantifiable benefits include the cost of a mobile phone at around €250 (US$300) as against conventional radios priced in the thousands.
Among   suppliers of the equipment is Allsopp Helikites, whose founder,  Sandy   Allsop, told ITS International that it is superior to drones in  having   endurance of up to an hour, “as opposed to 10 to 15 minutes”,  and “does   not need very skilled operators. Anyone can fly it with only  30 minutes   training”. There are also no legal restrictions of the  kind that apply   to drones, “which is of paramount importance in the  US”. 
     
The   company is  currently working on a portable ‘back-pack’ version, with   its own  helium balloon inflator, which a police officer or emergency   responder  could easily carry. This could cost around US$3,500 according   to  Allsopp, who said: “International development organisations are    interested in the potential for disaster management.”  Outside the US,    the concept is the subject of the EU-supported Aerial Base Stations  with   Opportunistic Links for Unexpected and Temporary Events  (ABSOLUTE)   project, led by 
     
ITS    International also quizzed Hixson about the prospects of the US    adopting a European-style universal automatic eCall-system – in addition    to the private ones already offered by automotive manufacturers like    GM’s subscription-based 
 
The    EU expects the technically and politically radical eCall  equipment,    which will be required in all EU Member States, to be  compulsorily    fitted to new cars and light vans from 2018 – some years  later than    originally anticipated. Vehicles will come off production  lines    pre-fitted with a GPS-based geolocating crash alert, triggered  by airbag    activation, which will flash an SOS direct to a PSAP. 
     
According     to the EU, when all mandated vehicles are equipped, it will save   €20bn   (US$25bn) annually on the current economic costs of road   accidents of   over €160bn (US$198bn) a year.
     
The     scheme has industry implications well beyond the geographical     boundaries of the EU because it will apply to vehicles that are imported     from outside the continental grouping.  In 2013, for example, US     manufacturers shipped vehicles worth US$8.4bn into Europe.
     
In     Asia, Japanese automotive electronics manufacturer 
     
As     for the US, Rookie says that he has “regular contact with tier 1 and  2    automotive OEMs.” Quizzed on any industry-wide initiatives to meet   the   incoming European requirements, a spokesperson for the Auto   Alliance  of  12 major US manufacturers said, “anti-trust laws would   prohibit us  from  knowing company product plans”.
 
     
         
         
        



