In-vehicle anti-collision systems continue to evolve and could eliminate some incidents altogether. John Kendall rounds up the current developments.
     
A few weeks ago, I watched a driver reverse a car from a parking bay at right angles to the road, straight into a car driving along the road. The accident happened at walking pace, no-one was hurt and both cars had body panels that regain their shape after a low speed shunt. 
     
While the driver should have been paying more attention or reverse parked, this type of accident could be virtually eliminated by technology within a few years by a proliferation of in-vehicle safety systems. 
     
In that particular case a cross-traffic alert system could have helped prevent the accident. The system uses radar sensors to sweep the area to the rear and sides of the car during reversing manoeuvres and senses vehicles and objects approaching the car up to a range of around 30m. 
     
If a vehicle is approaching the reversing car the reversing driver is alerted by an audible warning and signs on the dashboard. Current systems can only detect vehicles.
     
 
Radar sensors
Radar sensors are also used for the blind spot monitoring systems that have become widely available on cars in the past few years. These sense when a vehicle is in the blind spot around the rear quarters of the car where vehicles may not be visible in the driver’s mirrors. A warning light is usually illuminated in the relevant rear-view mirror (for cross traffic alert) or door mirror to warn the driver not to change lanes. This can help to prevent collisions during dual carriageway overtaking or motorway lane changing and is available from car manufacturers including 
     
The next obvious step would be to detect smaller objects, such as pedestrians and cyclists, a function reversing sensors already perform when reverse gear is selected. A further step would be integration with the vehicle braking so that if the driver fails to react to an approaching vehicle or object, the system would brake automatically to avoid an impact.
Such a system, known as autonomous  emergency braking (AEB), is already fitted to the front of the latest  Volvo XC90 seven-seat SUV model. While systems which detect potential  collisions with vehicles and objects ahead have been available for  several years, the Volvo system has been designed to operate in low  light conditions, by using sensing cameras with higher sensitivity and a  faster response time. 
  
Volvo’s  stated philosophy is that by 2020 no-one should  be killed or  injured  in a new Volvo car. Its latest XC90 is currently  the standard  setter  for car safety systems and comes with established  technology  such as  electronic stability control (ESC), blind spot  monitoring,  adaptive  cruise control (ACC) and lane departure warning  (LDW). But  integration  with other systems on the car has extended the  capabilities  offered,  notably by having the functionality to intervene  if the  driver does  not react. 
     
Volvo   claims  a world first in fitting Run-off Road protection. Half the   traffic  fatalities in the United States are caused by a single vehicle   leaving  the road. According to the company, in Sweden one-third of all   fatal  and severe injury crashes involve a single vehicle. Its latest    technology does not prevent such crashes but the system limits the    injuries front seat occupants’ are likely to suffer. Volvo calls this    Safe Positioning.  
If the  system detects the circumstances indicating the  car might be involved an  off-road incident, it automatically tightens  the front seat safety  belts until the car stops moving. In addition,  the seats have been  designed to minimise spinal injuries by increasing  the energy absorbing  potential between the seat and the seat frame. If  the car makes a hard  landing, the seat design is said to be able to  reduce vertical forces on  the occupant by up to one-third, helping to  reduce the severity of  spinal injuries. 
  
Automatic braking
Volvo claims another world first in fitting the XC90 with a system that automatically applies the brakes if the driver turns in front of an oncoming car at a crossroads. The system is designed to operate in low speed crossings such as in city traffic or at higher speeds at a wide intersection.     
 
This system is a development of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and ESC (in which yaw sensors detect possible loss of control and the system can brake wheels individually to bring the car back under control). AEB can bring the car to a controlled halt under emergency braking, if the driver does not apply the brakes. New cars sold in the EU cannot obtain a five-star Euro NCAP rating without AEB. While the system does not need to be fitted to every new car sold, it must be available as an option on a model to obtain the five-star rating.
This  type of system will be mandatory on new heavy    trucks sold in Europe  from 1 November 2015. Although car manufacturers    are not yet obliged to  fit it, it is hoped that the Euro NCAP move   will  persuade manufacturers  to offer the system. 
     
These     systems use radar or lidar (light detection and ranging) sensors at    the  front of the vehicle, often paired with stereo video cameras    mounted  either behind the rear-view mirror or high on the windscreen    for heavier  vehicles. They sense the object ahead and its distance from    the vehicle  while an electronic control unit determines when to    intervene by  braking and reducing power, if the driver does not respond    to the  audible and visual warnings.
     
  
Lane Departure Warning
 
  The    EU has also made Lane Departure Warning (LDW) systems mandatory  on    heavy vehicles from November 2015. These systems use video cameras  to    monitor the vehicle’s position relative to the lane lines and  warn the    driver if it is straying out of its lane. Warnings include  audible    rumble signals or applying steering torque through the wheel  to alert    the driver to steer back into the lane. Crashes during lane changing are potentially serious but the risks are greater for large vehicles of up to 18.75m in length where it is easy for the driver to overlook a car or motorcycle along the side of a truck. Exacerbating this problem is by the mix of left- and right-hand drive vehicles sharing the same road space as this means truck drivers are effectively on the ‘wrong’ side of the cab. This can pose difficulties in seeing a car alongside their vehicle during lane change manoeuvres. Electronically monitoring this blind spot should help to reduce lane change collisions.
     
 
The   size of trucks also obscure car driver’s vision which is  particularly   important when car drivers are considering overtaking a  truck on a   single carriageway per direction road. In Argentina this  scenario has   led to many crashes and prompted 
 
     
Another    advantage claimed for the Safety Truck is reducing the crash risk    caused by the truck braking suddenly to avoid hitting crossing animals. 
     
Currently,    the prototype truck has passed the testing phase and Samsung has   proved  the technology works and that this idea can save lives. The next   step  is to test compliance with the national protocols and obtain the    necessary permits and approvals.
     
 
Active safety systems
The    introduction of active safety systems, such as AEB, where the system    does not just alert the driver to potential accidents but intervenes  to   take avoiding action, has advanced safety systems in recent years.    Another feature available on the Volvo XC90 is Queue Assist. This not    only combines the car’s autonomous cruise control, AEB and lane    departure warning systems, but it can also take active control of the    steering. In queueing traffic, which may constantly advance a short    distance at low speed, then stop, the XC90 can carry out this function    automatically, accelerating the car, slowing it to a stop and keeping  it   in lane without input from the driver. 
 
BMW’s    Mini sub-brand displayed a new safety  concept based on a head-up    display (HUD) technology at the Auto  Shanghai Show in April. Instead of    projecting information onto a  screen or the vehicle’s windscreen, a    small unit projects it onto the  lens of a pair of spectacles worn by the    driver. 
     
Information such as  navigation data and speed are projected    onto the lens within the  wearer’s field of view. 
From    a safety perspective, claims that the system   provides a method  of    ‘seeing’ through the car’s A-pillar could help  to  reduce accidents     involving pedestrians, cyclists and  motorcyclists as  well as with   other   cars. 
     
Vehicle A-pillars have  become progressively  thicker to   increase   protection of occupants in  frontal impacts and  rollover   accidents. As a   consequence, it has  become all too easy for    pedestrians, cyclists and   motorcyclists to  be obscured by the    A-pillar, particularly where the car   and object  have a similar closing    speed. 
The    system uses  a wireless connection to the car to gather the necessary    information  from onboard cameras, sensors and other systems. 
     
As     displayed, the system capabilities included augmented parking. A    camera  in the nearside mirror housing relays images to the spectacle    screen to  improve the driver’s view of the kerbside while parking,    which could  help to alert the driver to nearby pedestrians. 
 
An     obvious drawback is the need for the driver to  wear spectacles  that     could prove problematic for existing spectacle  wearers, but  the     prototype system could be an indication of future  HUD  developments. The     new Volvo XC90 features a HUD system that   projects directly on to the     windscreen and arguably a system with   two or more projectors could     replicate the capabilities of the Mini   system without the need to wear     the spectacles. 
 
Motorcycle braking
Using sensors with an onboard control system, the new system apportions front/rear braking to maintain stability while the motorcycle is leaning over. Roll and pitch rates as well as lateral acceleration are monitored and the brake pressure applied in a more gradual way than with a conventional ABS system, meaning the rider is less likely to fall off while simultaneously cornering and applying heavy braking.
     
Onboard      safety systems have evolved from driver control to offering limited      intervention when loss of control seems likely, to predictive  systems     which take preemptive action to prevent the loss of control.  More can   be   done, as Continental Automotive demonstrated at this  year’s   Consumer   Electronics Show in Las Vegas.  
     
A      version of its dynamic eHorizon has already been trialled in 
  
So it seems in terms of safety systems, the line between driver aids and full autonomy gets ever thinner.
    
        



