Skip to main content

Connected vehicle technology the solution to safety?

A series of 'driver clinics' is under way across five states, as vehicle manufacturers and the US Government pin their hopes on connected vehicles becoming the next big advance in road safety. Pete Goldin reports. What would a car say if it could talk? Its first words might be: "Here I am". Many vehicles are communicating that very message to each other right now. Admittedly, this is in controlled environments of US Department of Transportation (USDoT) tests, but within the next few years 'connected vehicle
January 25, 2012 Read time: 8 mins
The next major vehicle safety advancement will depend on a decision from NHTSA, the vehicle aftermarket, costs and public acceptance

A series of 'driver clinics' is under way across five states, as vehicle manufacturers and the US Government pin their hopes on connected vehicles becoming the next big advance in road safety. Pete Goldin reports

What would a car say if it could talk? Its first words might be: "Here I am". Many vehicles are communicating that very message to each other right now. Admittedly, this is in controlled environments of 324 US Department of Transportation (USDoT) tests, but within the next few years 'connected vehicle' technology may be not only viable but actually mandated by the US Government.

Each year more than 30,000 people are killed on US roads.

USDoT and major vehicle manufacturers are betting millions of dollars on connected vehicle technology becoming the solution.

Research from USDoT's 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) shows that connected vehicle technology could prevent 80% of vehicle crashes involving non-impaired drivers, such as crashes due to intersections or lane changes.

"Connected vehicle technology is the next major vehicle safety advancement," says President and CEO of 560 ITS America Scott Belcher. "It is on a par with seat belts, airbags and electronic stability control." Greg Winfree, acting administrator for USDoT's Research & Innovative Technology Administration, adds: "The past several decades of auto safety have been dedicated to surviving crashes, but the future will be about avoiding crashes. That is what connected vehicles are all about."

Connecting vehicles

Connected vehicles communicate with each other and the roadway infrastructure via wireless technology. The primary objective is to warn drivers of potential dangers to help them avoid crashes, but the technology can also provide some valuable additional benefits by reducing congestion and greenhouse gas emissions.

Connected vehicle technology involves both vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications, transmitting vehicle data such as position, speed and location.

USDoT's ultimate vision of a next generation safety system is that all vehicles on the road - automobiles, trucks, buses, motor coaches and motorcycles - will be able to communicate with each other and infrastructure. The basic communication is a "Here I Am" message.

Currently, tests of connected vehicle technology are using a dedicated frequency spectrum at 5.9GHz called dedicated short range communication (DSRC), a form of WiFi with a special protocol designated 820.11p. DSRC has low latency and a short range and so is a communication option well suited for safety applications; more appropriate than other wireless alternatives such as cell phones.
USDoT is partnering with the Crash Avoidance Metrics Partnership (CAMP), a research consortium of major auto manufacturers established to push forward with development of connected vehicle technologies with research, testing and setting of standards. CAMP - which includes 278 Ford Motor, 948 General Motors, 1683 Honda, 1684 Hyundai Kia, Mercedes-Benz, 838 Nissan, 1686 Toyota and 994 Volkswagen - is funded by USDoT, as well as the automakers.

Clinical trials


The latest phase of USDoT's connected vehicle programme is a series of 'driver clinics' under way since August 2011 and due to run until January 2012 in Brooklyn, MI; Brainerd, MN; Orlando, FL; Fort Worth, TX; and Blacksburg and Alameda, VA.

"These clinics are vital to understanding how drivers will respond to the technology and how connected vehicles communicate in real world scenarios," says NHTSA administrator David Strickland.

The purpose of the driver clinics is to enable researchers to observe the responses of drivers in cars equipped with V2V systems. About 100 local drivers are recruited to drive 24 cars at each of the clinics, which take place in controlled environments designed to simulate real roads and intersections, at venues such as Walt Disney World Speedway, Texas Motor Speedway and Alameda Naval Air Station. Drivers first watch a video explaining the different safety applications, before getting behind the wheel with professional drivers to go through a predetermined course where they experience the alerts and warnings generated by the connected vehicle applications.

 "During the first driver clinic in Brooklyn, the safety applications were very well received, with several drivers commenting that they see some clear safety benefits to the technology," Greg Winfree says. He adds that at no time during the tests would the connected vehicle system take over control of the vehicle. The technology is designed solely to alert drivers to any impending hazards, at which time the driver would need to take appropriate action.

The specific alert messages tested at the clinics include emergency brake; forward collision, blind spot, lane change and 'do not pass' warnings; intersection movement assist; and left turn assist.

Getting the message across

In addition to automakers' connected vehicle research, a key goal of the clinics is determination of the best method of communicating warning alerts to drivers.

"We use an urgent tone and flashing red lights in a head-up display," explains Ford Product Development research technical leader Mike Shulman, referring to collision warning systems in development. "Our first goal is to get the driver to look around and brake. We want the driver to see that something is happening up ahead. So far in our testing that has worked really well. People understand it." Shulman explains that using a verbal warning or text message is not practical because of language issues. The alerts must be universally understood. In addition, text messages could be counterproductive because they would cause drivers to take eyes off the road at critical moments when they need to be very aware of their environments.

"It is all research right now," says 1688 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDoT) maintenance and operations engineer Steve Cook. "Decisions will have to be made regarding how the vehicle will interface with the driver. How that would actually be done, to minimise distraction to the driver, still has to be studied."

Pilot deployment

The driver clinics are the first phase of a two-part research program. The second will be a 'safety pilot model deployment' of V2V and V2I technology, due to begin in August 2012, after researchers have studied the data from the clinics.

The model deployment, to be conducted by MDoT and the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), is being funded by a $14.9M research contract from the USDoT. "This project will involve some 2,800 vehicles equipped with wireless devices, everything from light to heavy and transit vehicles, that will spend a year on roadways in and around Ann Arbor in Michigan," says Winfree.

Since the driver interaction will be studied extensively during the clinics, this phase is only meant to test the wireless DSRC technology. MDoT's Steve Cook expects the connected vehicle system to be used during the model deployment will not even alert the drivers. "The aims of the model deployment are to see how much data we can manage in a confined area and how we can pinpoint where all the vehicles are," he explains.

On the roads

Results from both phases of the research programme will be used by NHTSA to determine whether V2V and V2I technology will be required for all vehicles operating on US roads. NHTSA's decision is expected to be made in 2013 for light vehicles and 2014 for heavy vehicles.

Even if mandated by NHTSA, however, connected vehicle technology may still face a difficult road. One of the primary challenges to real world implementation is the fact that all vehicles currently on the road will somehow have to be retrofitted with appropriate equipment. If only new vehicles have the technology installed, it will defeat the whole concept of connected vehicles, because for years most of the cars on the road will not be able to communicate. So development of communication devices by the US vehicle aftermarket will be a vital factor in the success of the connected roadway.

Another implementation challenge, exacerbated by the retrofit issue, starts with the big question: who is going to pay for all this? "In terms of funding for the deployment, we think that the extra cost to the vehicle will be relatively low," says Mike Shulman. "But how much it will cost and ultimately who will pay for it - there are a lot of different pieces that still have to come together." Steve Cook says: "We have to decide who is going to implement the infrastructure and who is going to maintain and operate it. There are a lot of decisions still to be made." Connected vehicle technology also faces a public acceptance challenge, due to concerns about privacy, because vehicle locations and information will be transmitted to government authorities and third parties. The experts all agree this is an important issue, but one that will be overcome because, they believe, drivers will ultimately accept that this technology does not invade privacy as vehicle data is anonymous.

USDoT and its automaker partners in CAMP clearly feel the benefits of connected vehicle technology are worth the effort in trying to overcome the challenges. David Strickland concludes: "We envision connected vehicle technology as a platform for saving many lives on America's roads. It also promises to foster innovations we've yet to imagine - a game changer for safety."

Related Content

  • February 1, 2012
    Advanced in-vehicle user interface - future developments
    Dave McNamara and Craig Simonds, Autotechinsider LLC, look at human-machine interface development out to 2015. The US auto industry is going through the worst crisis it has faced since the Great Depression. But it has embraced technologies that will produce the best-possible driving experience for the public. Ford was the first OEM to announce in-car internet radio and SYNC, its signature-branded User Interface (UI), is held up as the shining example of change embracement.
  • August 21, 2014
    Ken Leonard talks to ITS International
    Ken Leonard, director of the USDOT’s ITS Joint Program office made time in his schedule during the Helsinki Congress to speak to ITS International. It has been 18 months since Ken Leonard took over as the director of the Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office at the US Department of Transportation. With 30 years of technical experience behind him, to say he is enjoying the challenge would be to put it mildly: “It is incredibly exciting to be working in intelligent transportation systems, th
  • March 14, 2016
    Connected vehicle trials get big backing from USDOT
    Connected vehicle technology will emerge as a sustainable reality at three sites in the US over the next four years. Jon Masters reports. Advocates of connected vehicle (CV) technology have received a welcome boost from news that the US government has committed a further $4 billion towards automated vehicle research and CV technology. This comes hot on the heels of the US Department of Transportation’s $42 million CV pilot pledge in October last year.
  • September 26, 2014
    America’s legislature to consider the future of 5.9GHz
    Colin Sowman catches up with the latest moves in the 5.9GHz exclusivity debate. The Wi-Fi Innovation Act, recently introduced to both the US Senate and its House of Representatives, moves into a new phase in the debate over the exclusive right of the 5.9GHz band for Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) communications. If the Act comes into law, it would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to conduct tests across the whole 5GHz band to determine if the spectrum can be shared without interfering with curr