Skip to main content

Utah plans road user charging by 2031

Utah DoT report explores expansion scenarios for alternative to state fuel tax funding
By Ben Spencer June 30, 2021 Read time: 3 mins
UDoT says the report serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case (© Helena Bilkova | Dreamstime.com)

The Utah Department of Transportation (UDoT) has published a report with a plan to enroll all registered vehicles in a road usage charge programme by 31 December 2031.

The programme was launched in January 2020 as an alternative to the state fuel tax to create more sustainable funding for the US state's transportation system.

It is based on a 'user pays' principle, charging drivers a fee based on miles driven rather than fuel purchased. 

UDoT says the health of Utah's transportation infrastructure has been in jeopardy for years as the state fuel tax, which helps fund the US state's transportation system, fails to keep pace with funding needs. 

Additionally, the growth of electric vehicles and highly fuel-efficient vehicles, including gas hybrids and plug-in electric hybrids, has led to the decline of revenues per mile driven.

These factors have left the fuel tax incapable of producing enough revenue to support adequate investments in the transportation system, the department adds. 

Utah Road Usage Charge Report explores the appropriate pace of expansion for the current road usage charge programme. It also provides a menu of options for policymakers, including the opportunities and challenges of different implementation scenarios, and serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case.

The two expansion scenarios presented include Scenario A (mass implementation with manual odometer reading only) and Scenario B (phased implementation with technology-reliant mileage reporting).

A summary of each scenario's opportunities and challenges shows that A is the fastest to implement, collecting the most revenue.

However, it does not complement the current road usage charge programme and results in “limited future policy levers”.

This scenario would also require extensive public engagement by 2024 to successfully educate and enroll the two million eligible vehicles.

The report describes Scenario B as a “tempered approach” that could prove less risky while also complementing the current road usage charge programme.

It would also allow more time for education to reach target vehicle owners with 570,000 eligible vehicles in 2024 and a more gradual expansion over eight years. 

The UDoT insists the expansion of the programme should include what it calls a two-year ramp-up period. 

According to the department, this will allow time to implement communication and engagement strategies with the public and allow the agencies time to prepare for the expansion to minimise operational issues.

During this period, the current programme would continue to grow as the fleet gradually transitions to more alternative fuel vehicles or would continue to increase the flat fees imposed on these vehicles. 

This two-year window should be used to properly develop and test changes and enhancements to the required road usage charge systems to increase overall programme success. 
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Report exposes smart city tech gaps
    July 29, 2021
    World Economic Forum finds fewer than 25% of cities conduct privacy assessments
  • Can drivers be responsible for AV offences?
    January 28, 2022
    Report in UK from two Law Commissions recommends a new Automated Vehicles Act
  • Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    February 1, 2012
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is
  • Report recommends road user charging for all Australia’s roads
    September 24, 2014
    A new review by the commissioned by the Australian Federal Government and chaired by University of Melbourne economics professor Ian Harper makes a strong case for what it calls ‘cost-reflective road pricing’. The 313 page review of competition policy in Australia says the advent of new technology presents opportunities to improve the efficiency of road transport in ways that were unattainable two decades ago. Linking road user charges to road construction, maintenance and safety should make road investm