Skip to main content

Utah plans road user charging by 2031

Utah DoT report explores expansion scenarios for alternative to state fuel tax funding
By Ben Spencer June 30, 2021 Read time: 3 mins
UDoT says the report serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case (© Helena Bilkova | Dreamstime.com)

The Utah Department of Transportation (UDoT) has published a report with a plan to enroll all registered vehicles in a road usage charge programme by 31 December 2031.

The programme was launched in January 2020 as an alternative to the state fuel tax to create more sustainable funding for the US state's transportation system.

It is based on a 'user pays' principle, charging drivers a fee based on miles driven rather than fuel purchased. 

UDoT says the health of Utah's transportation infrastructure has been in jeopardy for years as the state fuel tax, which helps fund the US state's transportation system, fails to keep pace with funding needs. 

Additionally, the growth of electric vehicles and highly fuel-efficient vehicles, including gas hybrids and plug-in electric hybrids, has led to the decline of revenues per mile driven.

These factors have left the fuel tax incapable of producing enough revenue to support adequate investments in the transportation system, the department adds. 

Utah Road Usage Charge Report explores the appropriate pace of expansion for the current road usage charge programme. It also provides a menu of options for policymakers, including the opportunities and challenges of different implementation scenarios, and serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case.

The two expansion scenarios presented include Scenario A (mass implementation with manual odometer reading only) and Scenario B (phased implementation with technology-reliant mileage reporting).

A summary of each scenario's opportunities and challenges shows that A is the fastest to implement, collecting the most revenue.

However, it does not complement the current road usage charge programme and results in “limited future policy levers”.

This scenario would also require extensive public engagement by 2024 to successfully educate and enroll the two million eligible vehicles.

The report describes Scenario B as a “tempered approach” that could prove less risky while also complementing the current road usage charge programme.

It would also allow more time for education to reach target vehicle owners with 570,000 eligible vehicles in 2024 and a more gradual expansion over eight years. 

The UDoT insists the expansion of the programme should include what it calls a two-year ramp-up period. 

According to the department, this will allow time to implement communication and engagement strategies with the public and allow the agencies time to prepare for the expansion to minimise operational issues.

During this period, the current programme would continue to grow as the fleet gradually transitions to more alternative fuel vehicles or would continue to increase the flat fees imposed on these vehicles. 

This two-year window should be used to properly develop and test changes and enhancements to the required road usage charge systems to increase overall programme success. 
 

Related Content

  • May 5, 2021
    ‘Shining moment of opportunity for tolling’
    Climate change is already affecting tolling operations in many parts of the world. IBTTA’s Bill Cramer explains how the sector can be seen as a proven funding and financing mechanism for surface transportation
  • August 25, 2016
    HERMES Study provides guidance for forward ITS thinking in Finland
    Having authored HERMES, a major study for the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communication, Josef Czako talks to ITS International about his findings and lessons for other authorities. When CEOs of major automakers are predicting more change in the next five years than in the past 50, what is the role of national authorities considering the benefits of innovations in ITS?
  • January 26, 2012
    Debating road user charging systems
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being
  • July 8, 2019
    London needs just one road user charge, says report
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London