Skip to main content

Utah plans road user charging by 2031

Utah DoT report explores expansion scenarios for alternative to state fuel tax funding
By Ben Spencer June 30, 2021 Read time: 3 mins
UDoT says the report serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case (© Helena Bilkova | Dreamstime.com)

The Utah Department of Transportation (UDoT) has published a report with a plan to enroll all registered vehicles in a road usage charge programme by 31 December 2031.

The programme was launched in January 2020 as an alternative to the state fuel tax to create more sustainable funding for the US state's transportation system.

It is based on a 'user pays' principle, charging drivers a fee based on miles driven rather than fuel purchased. 

UDoT says the health of Utah's transportation infrastructure has been in jeopardy for years as the state fuel tax, which helps fund the US state's transportation system, fails to keep pace with funding needs. 

Additionally, the growth of electric vehicles and highly fuel-efficient vehicles, including gas hybrids and plug-in electric hybrids, has led to the decline of revenues per mile driven.

These factors have left the fuel tax incapable of producing enough revenue to support adequate investments in the transportation system, the department adds. 

Utah Road Usage Charge Report explores the appropriate pace of expansion for the current road usage charge programme. It also provides a menu of options for policymakers, including the opportunities and challenges of different implementation scenarios, and serves as a policy roadmap and toolbox rather than a business case.

The two expansion scenarios presented include Scenario A (mass implementation with manual odometer reading only) and Scenario B (phased implementation with technology-reliant mileage reporting).

A summary of each scenario's opportunities and challenges shows that A is the fastest to implement, collecting the most revenue.

However, it does not complement the current road usage charge programme and results in “limited future policy levers”.

This scenario would also require extensive public engagement by 2024 to successfully educate and enroll the two million eligible vehicles.

The report describes Scenario B as a “tempered approach” that could prove less risky while also complementing the current road usage charge programme.

It would also allow more time for education to reach target vehicle owners with 570,000 eligible vehicles in 2024 and a more gradual expansion over eight years. 

The UDoT insists the expansion of the programme should include what it calls a two-year ramp-up period. 

According to the department, this will allow time to implement communication and engagement strategies with the public and allow the agencies time to prepare for the expansion to minimise operational issues.

During this period, the current programme would continue to grow as the fleet gradually transitions to more alternative fuel vehicles or would continue to increase the flat fees imposed on these vehicles. 

This two-year window should be used to properly develop and test changes and enhancements to the required road usage charge systems to increase overall programme success. 
 

Related Content

  • November 14, 2017
    America explores road user charging options
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax
  • November 27, 2017
    America explores road user charging options
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax in
  • December 16, 2016
    Study reveals unexpected effects of replacing fuel tax
    Eric O’Rear, Wallace Tyner and Kemal Sarica examine the far-reaching implications of replacing fuel taxes with a mileage tax. Lawmakers at both the federal and state level are frustrated over declining fuel tax revenues as they struggle to fund projects for constructing and maintaining state-wide infrastructure.
  • January 19, 2012
    Road user charging - replacing the gas tax with a mileage based fee
    Oregon Department of Transportation's James Whitty discusses his state's progress with VMT fee-based charging. Back in 2001, the state of Oregon stole a lead on the rest of the US when it decided to address the need to do something about the gas tax and its decreasing ability to fund highway construction and upkeep. Recognising that a dwindling pot of money could only shrink further as vehicles became more fuelefficient, Oregon's Legislative Assembly passed laws which led to the setting up, by the state's g