Skip to main content

UK should consider 'road miles' pricing, says AA

Motoring organisation urges 'more radical thinking' after lockdown
By David Arminas June 8, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
A road miles pricing scheme after the dark days of Covid-19? (© Jevanto | Dreamstime.com)

The head of one of the largest UK motoring organisations is backing a “road miles” pricing system for drivers, according to media reports.

Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association (AA), said “more radical thinking” from metropolitan and city leaders is needed as the country emerges from the Covid-19 crisis.

King said people’s experience of cleaner air, quieter roads and home-working means an opportunity for positive change exists.

“I am optimistic that this lockdown is beginning to change the attitudes of drivers … If local authorities can put in well planned infrastructure to walk and to cycle – and public transport when that returns – I do feel that can have a credible difference,” he said.

King was speaking at a virtual conference organised by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, a non-profit organisation that supports debate on energy and climate change issues in the UK.

The Guardian newspaper noted that King said a car miles – or road miles – system could allow urban drivers to have the first 3,000 miles free and rural drivers would get an extra 1,000 miles free.

After these miles, they would have to pay per journey.

King said the AA’s own research that showed its members were ready to change their behaviour after lockdown ends.

“Transport patterns won’t be the same in life after lockdown, according to drivers,” he said. “Half say they will walk more; four in 10 vow to drive less; a quarter will work from home more and one fifth will cycle more.”

The Guardian also noted that a per-mile charging scheme based on the environmental impact of vehicle journeys has become more popular in recent years.

London mayor Sadiq Khan reportedly has considered a per-mile charging scheme in the capital city.

According to the Centre for London, a thinktank backed by some politicians and business groups, has said such an urban charge would be a more sophisticated approach to road charging and be an improvement on London’s current ultra-low emissions zone.

This article was amended to 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • RAC: over half of drivers believe congestion has worsened on UK major roads
    November 2, 2017
    56% of 1,727 drivers questioned in an annual survey believe that congestion has worsened on UK major roads, which carries 65% of all traffic, despite them comprising only 13% of the country’s road network. The findings from the survey have been presented by the RAC’s Report on Motoring.
  • Two initiatives announced to cut road works disruption in London
    May 17, 2012
    A joint US$1.6 million fund to research and develop new technology to reduce the disruption caused by road works was announced yesterday by UK Transport Secretary, Philip Hammond and the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson. Confirmation of a lane rental scheme for roadworks was also announced at the same time.
  • Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    June 14, 2018
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s