Skip to main content

UK should consider 'road miles' pricing, says AA

Motoring organisation urges 'more radical thinking' after lockdown
By David Arminas June 8, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
A road miles pricing scheme after the dark days of Covid-19? (© Jevanto | Dreamstime.com)

The head of one of the largest UK motoring organisations is backing a “road miles” pricing system for drivers, according to media reports.

Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association (AA), said “more radical thinking” from metropolitan and city leaders is needed as the country emerges from the Covid-19 crisis.

King said people’s experience of cleaner air, quieter roads and home-working means an opportunity for positive change exists.

“I am optimistic that this lockdown is beginning to change the attitudes of drivers … If local authorities can put in well planned infrastructure to walk and to cycle – and public transport when that returns – I do feel that can have a credible difference,” he said.

King was speaking at a virtual conference organised by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, a non-profit organisation that supports debate on energy and climate change issues in the UK.

The Guardian newspaper noted that King said a car miles – or road miles – system could allow urban drivers to have the first 3,000 miles free and rural drivers would get an extra 1,000 miles free.

After these miles, they would have to pay per journey.

King said the AA’s own research that showed its members were ready to change their behaviour after lockdown ends.

“Transport patterns won’t be the same in life after lockdown, according to drivers,” he said. “Half say they will walk more; four in 10 vow to drive less; a quarter will work from home more and one fifth will cycle more.”

The Guardian also noted that a per-mile charging scheme based on the environmental impact of vehicle journeys has become more popular in recent years.

London mayor Sadiq Khan reportedly has considered a per-mile charging scheme in the capital city.

According to the Centre for London, a thinktank backed by some politicians and business groups, has said such an urban charge would be a more sophisticated approach to road charging and be an improvement on London’s current ultra-low emissions zone.

This article was amended to 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • London’s new Cycle Superhighway given the green light
    September 1, 2016
    The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, and Transport for London (TfL) are to proceed with the North-South Cycle Superhighway to King’s Cross after majority support in the recent public consultation. The plans, which will also benefit pedestrians with wider pavements and more crossing points, were supported by 70 per cent of the public.
  • UK organisations disagree on smart motorway ‘dangers’
    September 13, 2019
    A spat over how dangerous the UK’s all lane running (ALR) or ‘smart’ motorways are has broken out between Highways England and a leading motoring organisation. Smart motorways do not have hard shoulders, instead relying on emergency areas at intervals to provide refuge for stranded motorists. The AA recently highlighted Stationary Vehicle Detection, a Highways England report published in March 2016, which looks at how long it takes to identify a vehicle broken down in a live lane of smart motorway when s
  • We need to talk about AVs
    October 15, 2021
    Will driverless vehicles lead to more deaths and destroy more lives than their manual counterparts? Transport writer Colin Sowman argues that they will
  • Managing congestion, better information changes perceptions
    January 31, 2012
    Kapsch's Dietrich Leihs talks about the true fundamentals of urban pricing. In some Italian and German towns and cities, the solution to congestion is an outright ban on certain types of vehicles. As far as Dietrich Leihs is concerned, any attempt to sweeten the pill that is congestion charging is only ever going to be a partial success at best.