Skip to main content

UK should consider 'road miles' pricing, says AA

Motoring organisation urges 'more radical thinking' after lockdown
By David Arminas June 8, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
A road miles pricing scheme after the dark days of Covid-19? (© Jevanto | Dreamstime.com)

The head of one of the largest UK motoring organisations is backing a “road miles” pricing system for drivers, according to media reports.

Edmund King, president of the Automobile Association (AA), said “more radical thinking” from metropolitan and city leaders is needed as the country emerges from the Covid-19 crisis.

King said people’s experience of cleaner air, quieter roads and home-working means an opportunity for positive change exists.

“I am optimistic that this lockdown is beginning to change the attitudes of drivers … If local authorities can put in well planned infrastructure to walk and to cycle – and public transport when that returns – I do feel that can have a credible difference,” he said.

King was speaking at a virtual conference organised by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, a non-profit organisation that supports debate on energy and climate change issues in the UK.

The Guardian newspaper noted that King said a car miles – or road miles – system could allow urban drivers to have the first 3,000 miles free and rural drivers would get an extra 1,000 miles free.

After these miles, they would have to pay per journey.

King said the AA’s own research that showed its members were ready to change their behaviour after lockdown ends.

“Transport patterns won’t be the same in life after lockdown, according to drivers,” he said. “Half say they will walk more; four in 10 vow to drive less; a quarter will work from home more and one fifth will cycle more.”

The Guardian also noted that a per-mile charging scheme based on the environmental impact of vehicle journeys has become more popular in recent years.

London mayor Sadiq Khan reportedly has considered a per-mile charging scheme in the capital city.

According to the Centre for London, a thinktank backed by some politicians and business groups, has said such an urban charge would be a more sophisticated approach to road charging and be an improvement on London’s current ultra-low emissions zone.

This article was amended to 

Related Content

  • August 19, 2015
    Tolling is still stuck on the sidelines says ASECAP speaker
    Geoff Hadwick attended ASECAP’s 2015 Study Days meeting in Lisbon and found a frustrated European tolling sector undertaking some soul searching. The international road tolling industry its failing to make it case and the sector is losing out to a range of other socio-political lobby groups according to International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) chief executive Pat Jones. Speaking at the recent 2015 ASECAP Study Days conference in Lisbon, Jones issued a stark warning: “Tolling is still o
  • June 21, 2019
    London to have ‘car-free day’ in September
    In a bid to highlight the ongoing problem of pollution from vehicles, London is to stage its biggest car-free day yet on 22 September. The Sunday date has been timed to coincide with World Car Free Day, which encourages motorists to give up their cars for a day. This type of activity is increasingly popular in cities worldwide – with Bogota, Colombia, and Jakarta, Indonesia, among the early adopters – as authorities wake up to the health impacts. More than half of air pollution in the UK capital is ca
  • April 23, 2020
    Standardise micromobility KPIs, urges Ramboll report
    Transportation consultancy Ramboll is urging cities to adopt standardised key performance indicators (KPIs) when attempting to integrate micromobility into their transportation networks.
  • February 1, 2012
    Time for a rethink on road user charging
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes