Skip to main content

Texans would support toll interoperability

As transportation industry experts from around the world gather in Austin, Texas for the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association’s 82nd Annual Meeting and Exhibition, 14-17 September, infrastructure solutions firm HNTB Corporation announces the results of a new America THINKS tolling survey, including the public’s views on tolling in the State. According to the survey, close to three in four (73 per cent) Texans who regularly drive on roads or bridges with tolls are pleased with the value
September 12, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
As transportation industry experts from around the world gather in Austin, Texas for the International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (63 IBTTA) 82nd Annual Meeting and Exhibition, 14-17 September, infrastructure solutions firm 6278 HNTB Corporation announces the results of a new America THINKS tolling survey, including the public’s views on tolling in the State.

According to the survey, close to three in four (73 per cent) Texans who regularly drive on roads or bridges with tolls are pleased with the value they receive for the fare paid. Fewer drivers on toll roads or bridges across the nation (65 per cent) are satisfied with the value they get for the toll they pay.

In fact, more than four in five (85 per cent) of Texans could also be influenced to use toll roads more often. Top motivators for those who would use toll roads more in reaching their destination more quickly include, if the toll road made their travel time faster and more reliable (73 per cent) and if it helped them avoid traffic (71 per cent). Improving infrastructure also is a driving force, as nearly half (49 per cent) would use toll roads more if they knew the money was going toward a worthwhile transportation cause, such as roadway repairs, new roads or improved local public transit.

And close to six in ten (59 per cent) would be pushed toward these routes if the fare was lower. Texans want the toll-paying process to be convenient when travelling outside of their area. More than four in five believe that if they have an electronic toll tag, it should work in other states in their region (86 per cent) or nationwide (84 per cent).

“Tolling is becoming the solution of choice for generating additional user-based transportation revenue,” said Scott Cooper, HNTB national toll practice consultant and vice president. “The 375 Texas Department of Transportation and regional toll authorities are using tolls and toll roads to manage congestion and add capacity that otherwise would have taken decades longer to get from the drawing board to the construction site.”

Despite this history of success, fewer Texans (55 per cent) than Americans as a whole (61 per cent) are likely to support tolls as part of a transportation project’s funding if there are insufficient funds from other sources.

The survey suggests public transportation usage could rise if tolls were in place. Nearly three in five (56 per cent) of Texans would be more likely to choose to use a bus if buses were an option on a toll road and it meant a safer, congestion-free and more reliable trip.

Many Texas residents are split as to whether or not they should have to pay tolls anytime they drive on a toll road (51 per cent), versus just when the toll road saves them time (49 per cent). In fact, the latter is true, the former is not; and Cooper said additional education could help address that issue.

However, more than seven in ten (72 per cent) of Texans think toll agencies should put drivers on probation or fine them for skipping on the fares they are supposed to pay. In fact, more than half (55 percent) think toll authorities should collect fines from offenders, and, on average, those who think fines should be collected say a US$34 fine sounds reasonable.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
  • Smart phones offer smarter way to pay for travel
    December 16, 2013
    David Crawford reviews developments in near field communications for mass transit payments. ‘A carefully-designed and well-implemented mobile near field communications (NFC) solutions can give passengers a compelling experience that will encourage them to make greater use of public transport.’ That was the confident conclusion of a recent joint White Paper drawn up by the International Association of Public Transport and the global mobile operators’ representative group GSMA.
  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • The real case for driverless mobility
    May 13, 2024
    What will automated driving really be good for? Bern Grush of Urban Robotics Foundation offers his thoughts on the big issues around its implementation - and suggests a newly-published book might point the way forward