Skip to main content

Suppliers chosen for ODOT road user charging project

Oregon’s Department of Transportation (ODOT) has preliminarily chosen Sanef, Verizon and telematics company Azuga as vendors in the nation’s first large scale pay-by the mile road usage charge (RUC) program, according to Michelle Godfrey, the program’s public affairs officer. Sanef was selected as the ODOT account manager to provide full turnkey mileage reporting and account management equipment and operations. The company served as the account manager in Oregon’s earlier pilot project. Verizon, alon
January 28, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
5837 Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) has preliminarily chosen 480 Sanef, 1984 Verizon and telematics company 7977 Azuga as vendors in the nation’s first large scale pay-by the mile road usage charge  (RUC) program, according to Michelle Godfrey, the program’s public affairs officer.

Sanef was selected as the ODOT account manager to provide full turnkey mileage reporting and account management equipment and operations. The company served as the account manager in Oregon’s earlier pilot project.

Verizon, along with Azuga, a subsidiary of Danlaw, were chosen to be commercial account managers for the program. They will compete with each other to offer program participants mileage tracking devices and other ancillary services, such as insurance discounts.

“Vendor relationships are preliminary until the vendor passes ODOT certification,” Godfrey told Toll Roads News. That certification includes a number of tests and performance criteria and “must occur before the vendor can provide services for the Road Usage Charge program,” she said.

Program participants will pay 1.5 cents per mile driven in lieu of paying Oregon’s 30 cents per gallon gasoline tax. Mileage will be tallied in one of three ways. The commercial account managers will offer telematics devices that include global positioning systems (GPS). These devices will track miles driven in-state and exempt miles driven out-of -state from the RUC.

ODOT, through Sanef, will offer a device that tracks mileage, but does not include a GPS. With this system, the user pays for all miles driven, whether they in-state or out-of -state. Users can opt to forgo the mileage trackers and pay a high flat rate.

All three vendors will start operational trials in April, Godfrey said.  A small number of volunteers will install tracking devices in their cars and test the vendors’ ability to track and report mileage, collect fees and manage customer accounts.

Although the full program with 5,000 volunteers won’t start until July this year, Oregon is scheduled to start a web site and marketing effort later this week to promote the RUC concept.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ARTBA proposes path to breaking gridlock on transportation funding
    March 13, 2015
    The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) has outlined a detailed proposal it believes could end the political impasse over how to fund future federal investments in state highway, bridge and transit capital projects. The ‘Getting beyond gridlock’ plan would marry a 15 cents-per-gallon increase in the federal gas and diesel motor fuels tax with a 100 per cent offsetting federal tax rebate for middle and lower income Americans for six years. The plan, ARTBA says, would fund a US$401 bil
  • Utah plans road user charging by 2031
    June 30, 2021
    Utah DoT report explores expansion scenarios for alternative to state fuel tax funding
  • Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    February 1, 2012
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst