Skip to main content

Study finds support for toll express lanes, less for mileage charges

A new report by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (MWCOG) finds that support for a toll managed lanes network grows somewhat the more it is discussed, whereas a vehicle miles travelled charge loses support after discussion. Among 300 people who participated in five-hour moderated small group discussions of alternative ways of dealing with traffic congestion in the Washington DC metro area, toll express lanes on all major highways receiv
September 16, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
A new report by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (MWCOG) finds that support for a toll managed lanes network grows somewhat the more it is discussed, whereas a vehicle miles travelled charge loses support after discussion.

Among 300 people who participated in five-hour moderated small group discussions  of alternative ways of dealing with traffic congestion in the Washington DC metro area, toll express lanes on all major highways received 60 per cent public support versus 10 per cent for a vehicle miles charge.

A third alternative, a congestion charge for entry to central zones had 50 per cent support and 34 per cent opposition. Even supporters thought it wouldn't help much to relieve congestion. Vehicle miles charges were seen by the vast majority as intrusive, ineffectual against congestion and difficult to enforce.

The report says there is wide scepticism about the ability of pricing to reduce traffic and about government’s ability to deliver on promises. The ability of a scheme to raise new revenue is not perceived as a positive since it is a majority view that governments have more than enough money already, but misspend it.

A widespread view that motorists only drive when they have gets in the way of acceptance of congestion pricing and the conclusion is drawn that pricing won't change motorist behaviour.

Toll express lanes, while not seen as a comprehensive solution, are popular for the choice and predictability of travel offered by a managed lanes toll network.
The opportunity toll express lanes offer to improve bus transit service is regarded as a major plus.

The study also found that a vast majority of people agree that congestion is a critical problem. 91 per cent of participants ‘agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ that congestion is a critical problem facing the region.

Participants talked a lot about pressures on the road system, saying they feel crowded by too many people and too much development, and that too many people are trying to use the roads.

Scepticism about government competence appears to be root of public unresponsiveness to calls for more revenue for transportation.

The addition of a bus rapid transit (BRT) system or other high-quality transit alternative was also an attractive feature of the scenario. Of all the transportation improvements discussed at the forums, BRT seemed to represent something truly new to many participants and attractive.

Related Content

  • America explores road user charging options
    November 27, 2017
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax in
  • Congestion charging in New York edges a wheel-length closer
    May 16, 2023
    'This is about more than reducing traffic' says city mayor, pledging transit investment
  • Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    April 29, 2015
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from
  • Brooklyn eyes Bogota’s BRT system
    June 17, 2016
    David Crawford considers the increased interest in bus rapid transit and looks that the latest trends. Bus rapid transit (BRT) is gaining an increasingly high profile in the US public transport agenda, for two main reasons. One is the potential for ‘trains on wheels’ to save substantially on installation costs as compared with other modes such as underground metros or light-rail transit. Another, highlighted in the case of New York City, is the value of having a rapid surface-based alternative available whe