Skip to main content

South African agencies in dispute over road tolls

The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency Sanral are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying Sanral is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling. The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads. Sanral initially withheld what it cons
June 10, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency 2161 SANRAL are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying SANRAL is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling.

The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads.

SANRAL initially withheld what it considered to be confidential documents on the costs of tolling; these were released to the city earlier this year. Mayoral committee member for Transport Brett Herron said the city’s supplementary court papers showed how much it would cost to convert the N1 and N2 into toll roads, how proposed toll fees would compare to those paid by motorists in Gauteng, the toll revenue expected from the N1 and N2 toll project and how much of the toll fees would be spent on the project infrastructure and operations.

“SANRAL wants to keep the cost to the taxpayer a secret by preventing the city from disclosing this information. SANRAL is using the excuse of ‘commercial confidentiality’ to prevent the public disclosure of information contained in the bids submitted by the companies that wish to toll the N1 and N2,” Herron said.

The city believes no part of the city’s court papers should be kept from the public. Herron said: “SANRAL is a public agency of the national Department of Transport and they should be transparent.”

The court has stipulated that SANRAL and the Protea Parkways Consortium, which made the initial unsolicited proposal that initiated the Winelands toll Project and has been selected by SANRAL as the preferred bidder,  must make an application to court by 17 June explaining why the city should not be allowed to file its supplementary papers openly.

Further court proceeding are expected before the dispute is finally resolved.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Tolling is still stuck on the sidelines says ASECAP speaker
    August 19, 2015
    Geoff Hadwick attended ASECAP’s 2015 Study Days meeting in Lisbon and found a frustrated European tolling sector undertaking some soul searching. The international road tolling industry its failing to make it case and the sector is losing out to a range of other socio-political lobby groups according to International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) chief executive Pat Jones. Speaking at the recent 2015 ASECAP Study Days conference in Lisbon, Jones issued a stark warning: “Tolling is still o
  • Asecap Days 2025: Call for papers extended
    October 2, 2024
    Speakers have until 15 October to submit for summit in Madrid on 26-28 May 2025
  • Monetising time savings makes toll roads financially stack up, says research
    September 29, 2017
    Putting a financial value on the savings from traffic congestion, noise and air pollution as a result of toll roads and tunnels will make large infrastructure projects more cost effective, according to a new study by Australia’s Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Sae Chi, from the university’s Science and Engineering Faculty, has compared the financial and economic cost of public and privately operated toll roads and tunnels, and found the net impacts to the community should be taken into account
  • San Francisco bans facial recognition
    July 23, 2019
    San Francisco has become the first US city to ban facial recognition software – and it is a move which has implications for transit agencies as well as police forces worldwide Big Brother is watching you’, goes the famous saying. Well, not in San Francisco he isn’t. Legislators in the Californian city – home to the tech gold rush and embracers of all things forward-looking – have decided that, after all, there should be limits to technology’s hold over us. By a margin of eight votes to one, the city’s