Skip to main content

South African agencies in dispute over road tolls

The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency Sanral are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying Sanral is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling. The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads. Sanral initially withheld what it cons
June 10, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency 2161 SANRAL are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying SANRAL is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling.

The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads.

SANRAL initially withheld what it considered to be confidential documents on the costs of tolling; these were released to the city earlier this year. Mayoral committee member for Transport Brett Herron said the city’s supplementary court papers showed how much it would cost to convert the N1 and N2 into toll roads, how proposed toll fees would compare to those paid by motorists in Gauteng, the toll revenue expected from the N1 and N2 toll project and how much of the toll fees would be spent on the project infrastructure and operations.

“SANRAL wants to keep the cost to the taxpayer a secret by preventing the city from disclosing this information. SANRAL is using the excuse of ‘commercial confidentiality’ to prevent the public disclosure of information contained in the bids submitted by the companies that wish to toll the N1 and N2,” Herron said.

The city believes no part of the city’s court papers should be kept from the public. Herron said: “SANRAL is a public agency of the national Department of Transport and they should be transparent.”

The court has stipulated that SANRAL and the Protea Parkways Consortium, which made the initial unsolicited proposal that initiated the Winelands toll Project and has been selected by SANRAL as the preferred bidder,  must make an application to court by 17 June explaining why the city should not be allowed to file its supplementary papers openly.

Further court proceeding are expected before the dispute is finally resolved.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • To charge or not to charge, that is the question
    January 26, 2018
    Alan Dron looks at why congestion charging and other similar schemes are so controversial in North America. In August, Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York State, described congestion charging for the city as “an idea whose time had come,” according to the Bloomberg wire service. In October, he announced a ‘Fix NYC’ advisory panel to study methods of easing congestion on the city’s streets. Although Cuomo did not specifically mention congestion charging when setting up the panel, he said it would study
  • Smart Cities: a journey, not a destination
    June 30, 2021
    As technologies evolve, cities of the future should prepare for expansion by establishing scal­able systems, suggest Benjamin Ho and James Birdsall of Parsons
  • Welcome to Digital, Free Flow Tolling
    April 17, 2024
    Emovis’ work in the Netherlands demonstrates many benefits of free flow tolling as Benoît Rossi, director of business development at Emovis, an Abertis-owned entity, highlights
  • Amsterdam reaps the reward of digitised parking
    April 20, 2016
    Amsterdam had taken the final step in digitising parking and parking enforcement and the move is paying dividends. It was almost a decade ago that the City of Amsterdam decided to start the evolution - or maybe even a revolution – of its parking enforcement: it got rid of the paper parking permit or ticket behind the windscreen and introduced the digital parking right. It was the first step on a bumpy but successful road to digitization, resulting in a fore running position in on street parking enforcement.