Skip to main content

South African agencies in dispute over road tolls

The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency Sanral are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying Sanral is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling. The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads. Sanral initially withheld what it cons
June 10, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The city of Cape Town and South Africa’s roads agency 2161 SANRAL are again in dispute over the proposed US$936 million N1 and N2 tolling project, with the city saying SANRAL is attempting to keep the public in the dark about the costs of tolling.

The Western Cape High Court last year put a temporary stop to the project until the finalisation of the city’s review application in which it is asking the court to set aside the decision to declare the N1 and N2 toll roads.

SANRAL initially withheld what it considered to be confidential documents on the costs of tolling; these were released to the city earlier this year. Mayoral committee member for Transport Brett Herron said the city’s supplementary court papers showed how much it would cost to convert the N1 and N2 into toll roads, how proposed toll fees would compare to those paid by motorists in Gauteng, the toll revenue expected from the N1 and N2 toll project and how much of the toll fees would be spent on the project infrastructure and operations.

“SANRAL wants to keep the cost to the taxpayer a secret by preventing the city from disclosing this information. SANRAL is using the excuse of ‘commercial confidentiality’ to prevent the public disclosure of information contained in the bids submitted by the companies that wish to toll the N1 and N2,” Herron said.

The city believes no part of the city’s court papers should be kept from the public. Herron said: “SANRAL is a public agency of the national Department of Transport and they should be transparent.”

The court has stipulated that SANRAL and the Protea Parkways Consortium, which made the initial unsolicited proposal that initiated the Winelands toll Project and has been selected by SANRAL as the preferred bidder,  must make an application to court by 17 June explaining why the city should not be allowed to file its supplementary papers openly.

Further court proceeding are expected before the dispute is finally resolved.

Related Content

  • Sorting sensible from shiny in tolling technology
    December 11, 2014
    Instead of always striving for the latest shiny toys Kevin Hoeflich of HNTB advises a 10-steps method for selecting the most appropriate technology. Amid the hype and razzmatazz surrounding the launch of Apple’s iPhone 6, the company also announced its new mobile payment system, Apple Pay. Built into the new iPhone 6, Apple Pay works at 220,000 merchants across America and is supported by major US banks and the big three credit card companies.
  • Drivers’ union calls on TfL to reconsider preliminary proposals on cab regulations
    February 24, 2016
    GMB, the union for professional drivers, is calling on Transport for London to reconsider some proposals that it put forward as preliminary indications as to how it wishes to proceed on the regulation of cab drivers, which it says waters down protection for passengers and drivers. It claims that mandatory Disclosure and Barring Service (DMS) checks for support staff have been watered down so that they do not apply to office-based staff. GMB consider that operators will be able to substitute office based
  • PTV strengthens South Africa link
    August 9, 2022
    Closer ties with Stellenbosch University support a new traffic management project
  • Slow development of Europe's road user charging
    April 24, 2013
    Delegates convened in Brussels for Europe’s 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in March, when both positive and negative developments came to light for advocates of more widespread introduction of RUC. Jon Masters reports. Goings on across Europe in recent months have again demonstrated how very sensitive road user charging (RUC) is politically. At the 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in Brussels at the beginning of March, a Danish delegation was notable for its absence, but Belgian governme