Skip to main content

San Fran moots congestion pricing to 'unclog'

City needs to cut rush-hour traffic substantially in order to ease jams
By Adam Hill October 1, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Downtown driving: can be something of a 'go-slow' at present (© Michaelurmann | Dreamstime.com)

San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) is gathering feedback from residents about the possibility of congestion pricing - by getting them to play an online game.

It says that downtown car trips during rush hour must be cut by at least 15% from 2019 levels to "significantly reduce congestion".

The zone under the microscope is in the north-east of San Francisco, including the Downtown and SoMa neighbourhoods.

SFCTA points out that London and Stockholm have both used congestion charging to keep traffic moving, and suggests that this "could increase safety, clean the air, and advance equity in San Francisco". 

The online game Unclog Fog City posits the scenario of gridlock in the city four years from now, when the threat from Covid-19 has receded and the economy is rebounding.

Asking for help to 'unclog Fog City', it invites people to design their own congestion pricing system (with the chance of winning a $100 gift card).

SFCTA suggests that congestion charges must be combined with discounts, subsidies and incentives to make the system fair and to encourage modes such as mass transit, walking and biking.

It insists that revenue from any system "would be reinvested into safer streets and better transit, particularly for low-income communities and communities of colour".

Findings from the game will be fed into the SFCTA's Downtown Congestion Pricing Study.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being
  • Siemens: self-driving minibuses are the future of first-/last-mile
    February 26, 2020
    Markus Schlitt, CEO of intelligent traffic systems at Siemens Mobility, talks to ITS International about safety and why it is important for cities to offer additional shared and connected transit options.
  • Is fare-free transit taking us for a ride?
    August 11, 2022
    More cities around the world are trialling fare-free public transit schemes. Do they work and are they sustainable? Andrew Stone puts absolutely no money on his travelcard and jumps on board
  • Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    February 1, 2012
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is