Skip to main content

Q-Free to continue Stockholm congestion maintenance

The Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) is to continue its contract with Q-Free for the service and maintenance of the congestion charging infrastructure in Stockholm. The three-year contract is valued at approximately US$6 million and commences in November 2013. Congestion charges were introduced in Stockholm in 2006, first as a trial followed by a referendum, then permanently from 2007. A 2011 report published by Elsevier in mid-2011 concludes that during the first five years of operation the
July 11, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The Swedish Transport Administration (6301 Trafikverket) is to continue its contract with Q-Free for the service and maintenance of the congestion charging infrastructure in Stockholm. The three-year contract is valued at approximately US$6 million and commences in November 2013.

Congestion charges were introduced in Stockholm in 2006, first as a trial followed by a referendum, then permanently from 2007. A 2011 report published by Elsevier in mid-2011 concludes that during the first five years of operation the traffic reduction caused by the charges has increased slightly over time, while effects on the traffic system have contributed to increasing public support. Alternative fuel vehicles were exempt from the charges through 2008, and this substantially increased the sales of such vehicles.

"We see Sweden as being in the forefront with respect to applying advanced road pricing systems to reduce traffic congestion, and we are proud to be a part of these initiatives also going forward", comments 108 Q-Free CEO Øyvind Isaksen.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Managing congestion, better information changes perceptions
    January 31, 2012
    Kapsch's Dietrich Leihs talks about the true fundamentals of urban pricing. In some Italian and German towns and cities, the solution to congestion is an outright ban on certain types of vehicles. As far as Dietrich Leihs is concerned, any attempt to sweeten the pill that is congestion charging is only ever going to be a partial success at best.
  • Sweden calls for focus shift away from cars
    May 1, 2012
    A report from the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) states that road traffic in Sweden must be reduced by 20 per cent if climate objectives are to be achieved by 2030, and 25 per cent reductions in road traffic are probably required in the Stockholm region. The administration believes the focus should shift from road traffic to public transport, cycle and pedestrian infrastructure The report also suggests more congestion charges in Malmö and Stockholm and that a kilometre tax should be introdu
  • A carbon free and accident free Europe by 2015?
    February 2, 2012
    By 2050, the Europe Commission aims to make transport in Europe carbon- and accident-free. Between now and then, however, a significant technological development and deployment effort is needed. Here, Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice-President for the Digital Agenda, talks about what's being done. In many respects, COOPERS, CVIS and SAFESPOT, set up by the European Commission (EC) to explore the potential of cooperative infrastructure systems, are already legacy projects. Between them, the three devel
  • Time for a rethink on road user charging
    February 1, 2012
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes