Skip to main content

Ohio Turnpike infrastructure project funds

The Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission (OTIC) has approved the US$930 million funding needed for ten projects in northern Ohio, each within twenty miles of the turnpike. The 241 mile-long, limited-access toll highway serves as a primary corridor to Chicago and Pittsburgh.
September 17, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission (OTIC) has approved the US$930 million funding needed for ten projects in northern Ohio, each within twenty miles of the turnpike.

The 241 mile-long, limited-access toll highway serves as a primary corridor to Chicago and Pittsburgh.

The projects were among ten that received funding in the turnpike’s first venture into financing projects using funds from toll charges.  Of the projects receiving funding, US$340 million was allocated towards construction of the eastbound bridge on the inner belt. The westbound bridge is under construction and expected to open to traffic this fall. It will carry traffic in both directions until the second bridge is completed in the fall of 2016. US$39 million was allotted to the Opportunity Corridor to help pay for the first leg of a US$334 million project to widen a one-mile stretch of East 105th Street from Chester Avenue to Quincy Avenue.

The corridor and bridge projects were among 12 for which the Ohio Department of Transportation sought funding. The commission rejected two as not meeting the basic criteria for securing turnpike money, which include the distance between the projects and the turnpike and the project’s impact on turnpike traffic density and toll revenue.

“This is a true partnership between our agencies. No trips start or end on the Turnpike, so our financial support of these projects is a benefit to the entire transportation system and Turnpike customers as well,” stated Rick Hodges, OTIC Executive Director.

Related Content

  • US economic stimulus package highlights ITS technology
    July 17, 2012
    US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood talks to ITS International about economic stimulus funding and the absolute need to maintain and increase the use of technology in transportation. Of the total of $787 billion of funding announced under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the economic stimulus package which was signed into law by US President Barack Obama on 17 February 2009, $48.1 billion will go to the US Department of Transportation (USDOT). Of that, $27.5 billion is for highway in
  • Mileage based charging offers secure future for funding
    August 10, 2016
    HNTB’s Matthew Click sets out why a move to mileage-based pricing is inevitable. Infrastructure is the most neglected yet the most critical engine of our society, and our continued indifference could lead to a dystopian future. Our roads, bridges and highways have been largely passed by in the digital age—marginalised in an era when funding is limited and stewardship of physical assets has given way to our preoccupation with technological innovation and data—the stuff of the virtual realm.
  • UK government to fund congestion-fixing road schemes
    October 25, 2013
    The UK government has approved funds to tackle congestion in two of the UK’s major cities, Birmingham and Leeds. Work needed to tackle congestion on the regionally strategic A452 road in Birmingham can now start after receiving final approval from Transport Minister Baroness Kramer. The road carries heavy traffic, creating poor access and a lack of reliable journey times for road users. The US$13 million improvements will improve the network, improve bus journey times and improve pedestrian and cyclist
  • Small toll agency adopts big city thinking
    December 5, 2014
    Andrew Bardin Williams looks at a novel option for new toll road authorities. While somewhat politically controversial, outsourcing has gained traction in the business world as a model worth investigating for its efficiency and cost saving benefits. Lean start-ups tend to employ independent contractors instead of full-time employees in an effort to remain flexible and avoid costs associated with pensions, retirement places, health insurance, office space and benefit packages.