Skip to main content

New York mayor urged to consider tolling to reduce city congestion

The de Blasio administration this week unveiled plans to tackle the New York's congestion crisis. Several of the new initiatives rely on enforcement, such as offences like the blocking of yellow boxes, blocking of bike and bus lanes and double parking. Other strategies revolve around managing curb space.
June 7, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The de Blasio administration this week unveiled plans to tackle the New York's congestion crisis. Several of the new initiatives rely on enforcement, such as offences like the blocking of yellow boxes, blocking of bike and bus lanes and double parking. Other strategies revolve around managing curb space.


However, City Council members maintained that anything short of congestion pricing that would de-incentivise driving wouldn’t make much of a difference.

Advocacy group MoveNY, which has consistently lobbied for congestion pricing, has again suggested that the city impose a congestion charge on motorists driving on Manhattan’s most crowded streets.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the city would impose a US$2.75 fee on cars entering Manhattan’s central business district south of 60th Street. Trucks would pay a higher fee, while taxis and other for-hire vehicles would pay a congestion surcharge based on travel within the zone.

If this came to pass, the group says, “New York City could raise about US$1 billion a year through the plan, which could pay for improvements to roads and bridges, as well as subsidise MetroCards for low-income households and improve bus service.”

Several council members have expressed their approval of the MoveNY proposal, but early indications are that de Blasio will not take the plan into consideration, says Curbed New York.

Related Content

  • May 31, 2013
    Assessing driver behaviour in work zones
    David Crawford looks at moves to increase throughput and safety in work zones.
  • June 14, 2018
    Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s
  • January 5, 2017
    City of London chiefs call for ban on new diesel cabs
    The City of London Corporation, local authority for the Square Mile, has called for a ban on new diesel private hire vehicles (PHVs) in its response to the Mayor of London’s air quality consultation. The Corporation also wants to see existing diesel PHVs removed from fleets as soon as possible to protect the public from exposure to toxic diesel emissions, with current licences phased out by 2020. The consultation had invited Londoners to have their say on the Mayor’s proposals to introduce a new Emiss
  • March 8, 2024
    Annika Lundkvist of Pedestrianspace.org: "How are you moving today?"
    It’s easy to say that people should embrace active travel – but it’s often not as simple as that. Advocates must beware of a disconnect with people’s lives and options on the ground, says Annika Lundkvist