Skip to main content

New York mayor urged to consider tolling to reduce city congestion

The de Blasio administration this week unveiled plans to tackle the New York's congestion crisis. Several of the new initiatives rely on enforcement, such as offences like the blocking of yellow boxes, blocking of bike and bus lanes and double parking. Other strategies revolve around managing curb space.
June 7, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
The de Blasio administration this week unveiled plans to tackle the New York's congestion crisis. Several of the new initiatives rely on enforcement, such as offences like the blocking of yellow boxes, blocking of bike and bus lanes and double parking. Other strategies revolve around managing curb space.


However, City Council members maintained that anything short of congestion pricing that would de-incentivise driving wouldn’t make much of a difference.

Advocacy group MoveNY, which has consistently lobbied for congestion pricing, has again suggested that the city impose a congestion charge on motorists driving on Manhattan’s most crowded streets.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the city would impose a US$2.75 fee on cars entering Manhattan’s central business district south of 60th Street. Trucks would pay a higher fee, while taxis and other for-hire vehicles would pay a congestion surcharge based on travel within the zone.

If this came to pass, the group says, “New York City could raise about US$1 billion a year through the plan, which could pay for improvements to roads and bridges, as well as subsidise MetroCards for low-income households and improve bus service.”

Several council members have expressed their approval of the MoveNY proposal, but early indications are that de Blasio will not take the plan into consideration, says Curbed New York.

Related Content

  • November 14, 2017
    America explores road user charging options
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax
  • November 27, 2017
    America explores road user charging options
    Jack Opiola casts an eye over the numerous road user charging pilots underway in the US. In the USA, congestion mitigation and improving mobility have often focused on network improvements, increased road capacity, improved public transport, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes or ‘express lanes’ and ITS measures – all of which require political capital and major funding. Nowadays, political capital is as hard to obtain as funding because more political leaders are recognising the decline of fuel excise tax in
  • November 17, 2020
    UK considers road user charging
    Expansion of EVs expected to create £40bn gap in fuel duty revenue which needs plugging
  • March 16, 2017
    Canada looks to HOT lanes to tackle congestion
    David Crawford sees an evidence-based approach to HOT lane conversions. Canada’s first high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes opened on 16 September 2016 as a pilot on a 16.5km section of existing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes running in both directions along Toronto’s Queen Elizabeth Way. Promised in two recent budgets