Skip to main content

Making the case for interstate tolling

A provision in the Grow America Act, introduced to Congress last month by Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx, proposes lifting a decades-old ban on tolling existing interstate general purpose lanes. According Daniel Papiernik, HNTB Corporation's mid-Atlantic toll services leader, writing in Roll Call, recent opposition to the proposal is short-sighted. He claims that relying on revenues derived from the gas tax is simply an unsustainable way of funding the nation’s aging roads, bridges and tunnels
May 30, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
A provision in the Grow America Act, introduced to Congress last month by Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx, proposes lifting a decades-old ban on tolling existing interstate general purpose lanes.

According Daniel Papiernik, 6278 HNTB Corporation's mid-Atlantic toll services leader, writing in Roll Call, recent opposition to the proposal is short-sighted.  He claims that relying on revenues derived from the gas tax is simply an unsustainable way of funding the nation’s aging roads, bridges and tunnels now and for the foreseeable future: “With the math not adding up (incoming revenue, costs of infrastructure maintenance and upgrade), tolls deserve to be part of every transportation policy discussion. States should be allowed to consider all options including the use of tolls on interstates to help cover the funding gap.”

Citing a nationwide HNTB poll, Papiernik makes the case for allowing US states to toll interstate highways. The survey of 1,000 drivers last year found that 71 percent would be willing to pay a toll if it resulted in faster, more reliable transport to their destination. The survey also found that 70 percent favoured their state’s department of transportation having the option to add tolls to major structures to keep them in good shape, exactly what Grow America proposes.

He goes on to say that traditional gas taxes have remained unchanged since 1993 and don’t have the same purchasing power as they once did. Meanwhile, the resiliency of the nation’s road, tunnel and bridge infrastructure is suffering. A recent analysis of 2013 National Bridge Inventory database maintained by the 324 US Department of Transportation showed that each day, almost a quarter-billion cars, trucks and school buses cross more than 63,000 structurally compromised bridges.

He quotes examples of how toll revenues are already being used to support transit, such as the Dulles Toll Road multi-modal corridor and the I-15 in San Diego, which uses toll revenues to support rapid bus transit along the same corridor, and points out that advances in technology are making distance-based pricing viable.

Papiernik says, “New technologies and techniques present state and federal policy makers with tools to help solve a vexing problem: the maintenance and improvement of transportation infrastructure that is vital to our nation’s economy.

“Relying on Congress during an election year to replenish the Highway Trust Fund with an increase of the gas tax or closure of tax loopholes is simply unrealistic. Add to this the evolution of technology which enables tolls to be collected safely and efficiently without stopping and it’s time to face reality and come out from behind the veil of an anti-toll animus.

“All options are, and should be, on the table as transportation leaders discuss creative approaches to improve our mobility and our economy. President Barack Obama and his administration are facing reality: Real problems with our infrastructure require real solutions including real choices.”

Related Content

  • April 2, 2015
    IBTTA, ARBTA, ATFI comment on latest Grow America Act
    The International Bridge, Toll and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) has applauded the Grow America Act 2.0 just released by the US Administration and US DOT. It says that once again, the Administration has boldly called for lifting the ban on Interstate tolling for the purpose of reconstruction, giving states greater flexibility to meet their challenging infrastructure and surface transportation needs. The six-year, US$478 is said to be US$126 billion more than current investment levels and US$238 billion mo
  • October 13, 2015
    Politicisation of US transportation funding
    Andrew Bardin Williams looks at how a political stalemate and a series of short-term fixes is undermining America’s highway funding and curtailing long-term planning. It was a week before the deadline to renew funding for the Highway Trust Fund, and the clock was ticking.
  • July 2, 2014
    USDOT outlines steps for managing Highway Trust Fund shortfall
    US Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx has written to state transportation departments and transit agencies outlining steps the Department of Transportation (DOT) will soon be forced to take to manage the impending insolvency of the Highway Trust Fund. In both letters, Secretary Foxx outlined the Department’s proposed plan while emphasising the need for Congress to act in order to avoid such a shortfall. “There is still time for Congress to act on a long term solution,” said Secretary Foxx. “Our tr
  • February 1, 2012
    Infrastructure funding and road user charging – debate continues
    Jack Opiola provides an overview of the ongoing debate over US infrastructure funding and the progress – or lack of it – towards vehicles miles travelled road user charging. The future funding of transportation and mobility infrastructure is attracting increased attention. There has been sharp debate in the US, where landmark reports from the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission both stated that the cu