Skip to main content

Kapsch: congestion zones need public support

Vital to get citizens on board, says John Horner of Kapsch TrafficCom North America
By Adam Hill April 26, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Revenues from congestion zones could be used to improve transport accessibility for disadvantaged groups (© Anizza | Dreamstime.com)

Cities and transport authorities need to engage their citizens if they are to make a success of congestion charging schemes.

That's the key message from John Horner, national practice lead - urban mobility at Kapsch TrafficCom North America, In an article published on IBTTA's Tolling Points.

"As interest in congestion pricing grows, the importance of education and dialogue is paramount," he says.

"The technical design and implementation of these systems is easy. It’s much harder to actually enhance mobility for all citizens by reducing congestion and increasing transport accessibility and availability."

Horner says that taking the public with you is vital - and that this requires explaining why congestion zones are a good idea in terms of the environment and equity.

He suggests current ways of funding roads are unfair, since registration fees, insurance and gas taxes "are the same for everyone but burden the poor more than the wealthy".

Revenues from demand-based pricing could be used to support initiatives which "improve transport availability and accessibility for the disadvantaged".

"Implemented correctly, congestion charging could therefore create more equitability while simultaneously reducing traffic congestion," he argues. 

However, while there is a good case for introducing congestion charging schemes, it "doesn’t mean the real-world system will live up to the potential", he points out.

"Countless details are needed to design a system that is achievable, equitable, and effective," he continues. "Revenue from the programme must be used responsibly. How does a city figure all that out?"

"The public must accept it," Horner concludes. "My journey from opposition to support required months of reading case studies, economic analyses, and traffic data studies. Most people won’t do that. How do we win their support?"

Among the points he suggests are that planning for a congestion zone must address questions about the on-the-ground effects of a new zone scheme, rather than simply talking about revenue projections to make the case.

Also, he thinks that cities might consider "drawing cordon lines based on social concerns even if engineering analysis suggests otherwise".

  • Elsewhere in the company, JB Kendrick has been appointed president of Kapsch TrafficCom North America. Formerly senior vice president of sales and business development, she replaces Chris Murray who has left the business.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe
  • Voting for change - the democratisation of transportation
    December 8, 2014
    Contra Costa is using an innovative planning method to gather suggestions and craft future transportation spending plans. Public opinion in matters relating to transport rarely exceeds complaints about congestion on the roads, crowded metros, slow buses with ‘exorbitant’ fares or perhaps enforcement cameras.
  • MaaS will be adopted quicker in Europe than in the US: here’s why
    December 5, 2018
    A new report suggests that MaaS will be implemented more quickly in Europe than in the US – but why should this be? Ben Spencer examines the arguments
  • US ushers in reforms with new transportation bill
    November 9, 2012
    On behalf of ITS America, Paul Feenstra maps out implications and opportunities for the ITS industry. A critical milestone was reached last month when the US Congress passed, and President Obama signed, legislation reauthorising the nation’s surface transportation programmes, breaking a nearly three-year log-jam which had stymied critical transportation reforms and delayed much-needed infrastructure projects. The law, numbered P.L. 112-141 but known as MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century),