Skip to main content

Kapsch: congestion zones need public support

Vital to get citizens on board, says John Horner of Kapsch TrafficCom North America
By Adam Hill April 26, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Revenues from congestion zones could be used to improve transport accessibility for disadvantaged groups (© Anizza | Dreamstime.com)

Cities and transport authorities need to engage their citizens if they are to make a success of congestion charging schemes.

That's the key message from John Horner, national practice lead - urban mobility at Kapsch TrafficCom North America, In an article published on IBTTA's Tolling Points.

"As interest in congestion pricing grows, the importance of education and dialogue is paramount," he says.

"The technical design and implementation of these systems is easy. It’s much harder to actually enhance mobility for all citizens by reducing congestion and increasing transport accessibility and availability."

Horner says that taking the public with you is vital - and that this requires explaining why congestion zones are a good idea in terms of the environment and equity.

He suggests current ways of funding roads are unfair, since registration fees, insurance and gas taxes "are the same for everyone but burden the poor more than the wealthy".

Revenues from demand-based pricing could be used to support initiatives which "improve transport availability and accessibility for the disadvantaged".

"Implemented correctly, congestion charging could therefore create more equitability while simultaneously reducing traffic congestion," he argues. 

However, while there is a good case for introducing congestion charging schemes, it "doesn’t mean the real-world system will live up to the potential", he points out.

"Countless details are needed to design a system that is achievable, equitable, and effective," he continues. "Revenue from the programme must be used responsibly. How does a city figure all that out?"

"The public must accept it," Horner concludes. "My journey from opposition to support required months of reading case studies, economic analyses, and traffic data studies. Most people won’t do that. How do we win their support?"

Among the points he suggests are that planning for a congestion zone must address questions about the on-the-ground effects of a new zone scheme, rather than simply talking about revenue projections to make the case.

Also, he thinks that cities might consider "drawing cordon lines based on social concerns even if engineering analysis suggests otherwise".

  • Elsewhere in the company, JB Kendrick has been appointed president of Kapsch TrafficCom North America. Formerly senior vice president of sales and business development, she replaces Chris Murray who has left the business.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • MaaS: A global wave that’s starting to break
    January 3, 2024
    Mobility as a Service – or whatever we’re going to end up calling it – makes sense in a world which is looking for less carbon-intensive ways of getting around. John Nuutinen of SkedGo talks to Adam Hill
  • Prowag signals change to vision statement
    February 15, 2024
    New pedestrian signal requirements designed to make crossings safer for the visually impaired mean that accessible signals are no longer just an option for US cities and municipalities. They now have the backing of the law, explains Andrew Stone
  • Drover AI’s Alex Nesic: ‘We’re still in the basement level of micromobility’
    April 12, 2022
    The micromobility revolution has reshaped the way we get around cities, but it has created some problems too. Drover AI’s PathPilot is here to help cities – and pedestrians – Alex Nesic tells Adam Hill
  • Urban tunnel replaces viaduct, improves safety
    October 10, 2012
    Earthquake sensors, automatic barriers and real time monitoring systems are all part of a scheme to make a major Seattle traffic artery safer, by taking it underground. Huw Williams reports. Seattle’s metropolitan area of 3.5 million people, like much of the western seaboard of the United States, lies in an earthquake zone. In Seattle’s case, the city and its hinterland sit atop a complex network of interrelated active geological faults capable of severe seismic activity and posing complex considerations fo