Skip to main content

Kapsch: congestion zones need public support

Vital to get citizens on board, says John Horner of Kapsch TrafficCom North America
By Adam Hill April 26, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Revenues from congestion zones could be used to improve transport accessibility for disadvantaged groups (© Anizza | Dreamstime.com)

Cities and transport authorities need to engage their citizens if they are to make a success of congestion charging schemes.

That's the key message from John Horner, national practice lead - urban mobility at Kapsch TrafficCom North America, In an article published on IBTTA's Tolling Points.

"As interest in congestion pricing grows, the importance of education and dialogue is paramount," he says.

"The technical design and implementation of these systems is easy. It’s much harder to actually enhance mobility for all citizens by reducing congestion and increasing transport accessibility and availability."

Horner says that taking the public with you is vital - and that this requires explaining why congestion zones are a good idea in terms of the environment and equity.

He suggests current ways of funding roads are unfair, since registration fees, insurance and gas taxes "are the same for everyone but burden the poor more than the wealthy".

Revenues from demand-based pricing could be used to support initiatives which "improve transport availability and accessibility for the disadvantaged".

"Implemented correctly, congestion charging could therefore create more equitability while simultaneously reducing traffic congestion," he argues. 

However, while there is a good case for introducing congestion charging schemes, it "doesn’t mean the real-world system will live up to the potential", he points out.

"Countless details are needed to design a system that is achievable, equitable, and effective," he continues. "Revenue from the programme must be used responsibly. How does a city figure all that out?"

"The public must accept it," Horner concludes. "My journey from opposition to support required months of reading case studies, economic analyses, and traffic data studies. Most people won’t do that. How do we win their support?"

Among the points he suggests are that planning for a congestion zone must address questions about the on-the-ground effects of a new zone scheme, rather than simply talking about revenue projections to make the case.

Also, he thinks that cities might consider "drawing cordon lines based on social concerns even if engineering analysis suggests otherwise".

  • Elsewhere in the company, JB Kendrick has been appointed president of Kapsch TrafficCom North America. Formerly senior vice president of sales and business development, she replaces Chris Murray who has left the business.

Related Content

  • To charge or not to charge, that is the question
    January 26, 2018
    Alan Dron looks at why congestion charging and other similar schemes are so controversial in North America. In August, Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York State, described congestion charging for the city as “an idea whose time had come,” according to the Bloomberg wire service. In October, he announced a ‘Fix NYC’ advisory panel to study methods of easing congestion on the city’s streets. Although Cuomo did not specifically mention congestion charging when setting up the panel, he said it would study
  • Revel to bring e-ride-share to Manhattan 
    May 7, 2021
    Charging stations and EV adoption rely on each other, creating 'chicken and egg' problem
  • Smart cities: first, define your strategy
    April 27, 2020
    How smart are we really being about smart mobility? Martin Howell of Worldline UK and Ireland reckons we could do better – but to do so you have to start asking the right questions…
  • Evidence growing for distance-based charging
    January 18, 2012
    The case is growing for an alternative to fuel taxation for funding highway infrastructure. A more sustainable system of mileage-based charging can be established in a way that is acceptable to the travelling public, writes Jack Opiola. Fuel tax - the lifeblood relied on for 80 years to maintain and improve roads and transit systems - is now in considerable jeopardy in the United States. Increased vehicle fuel efficiency and a poor economy already hamper generation of fuel tax revenue; now a recent federal