Skip to main content

ITS Australia welcomes APC and ACCC statements on ITS

Recent statements by the Australian Productivity Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission encouraging the exploration of intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies to tackle transport challenges have been warmly welcomed by ITS Australia.
August 13, 2014 Read time: 3 mins

 Recent statements by the Australian Productivity Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission encouraging the exploration of intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies to tackle transport challenges have been warmly welcomed by 858 ITS Australia.

The Productivity Commission inquiry Report on Public Infrastructure recommended that the Australian Government actively encourage State and Territory Governments to undertake pilot studies on the use of vehicle telematics for distance and location road charging for cars and other light vehicles.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recommended that congestion pricing should be on the table in any debate over further economic reform. The ACCC believes that unlike other parts of the economy, the prices paid by road users do not reflect the economic cost of using roads.

ITS Australia chief executive officer Susan Harris said that ITS can now support a much more sophisticated approach to charging for road use, which is more closely matched to actual usage.  

“Traditional approaches of registration fees and fuel excise have worked to a point, but we now have the technology to support a fairer, more sophisticated approach that will deliver community safety and efficiency benefits,” she said.

“ITS can also increase the productivity of roads. Existing roads in Australia now carry more traffic than ever with the aid of electronic traffic management systems. This is thanks to systems such as ramp metering, variable speed signs, ramp signals, traffic light coordination, in-car GPS and others.

“When new roads are built, ITS tools built into the new infrastructure maximise the return on the community’s investment. By better managing traffic, these systems also make roads safer,” Harris continued.

The Productivity Commission said that more direct charging of light vehicles has the potential to provide a better road system for motorists, if combined with reforms that hypothecate the revenue to road provision as a price for a service.

The Commission considers that the best way forward is for the State and Territory Governments to use the opportunity created by developments in vehicle telematics to trial direct charging for light vehicles across their road networks.

The report recommends report that the Australian Government should offer to partly fund these pilot studies and work with the States and Territories to address privacy concerns and share lessons from the trials and overseas experience. It also recommends that motorists are directly involved via roads and motorists associations.

“ITS Australia welcomes the Productivity Commission and the ACCC recommendations to support the use of technology to more effectively manage congestion and road user charging. We now have access to proven, low cost technologies to support distance and location based charging.  The move to distance and location based charging provides a framework to increase both the safety and efficiency of our road network,” said Harris.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Why Netflix could overcome road pricing resistance
    October 28, 2019
    As the US moves towards a national road usage charging trial, education is paramount – and subscription services like Netflix might help people understand why the money is needed, writes Bill Cramer
  • Submissions invited for Australia’s national tolling forum
    November 10, 2016
    Australia’s 2017 National electronic Tolling Forum (NeTC), Converging Smarter Tolling Technologies, which takes place in Sydney on 23-25 May, will address the challenges and opportunities faced by the tolling industry and their impact on business and personal mobility.
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    June 14, 2018
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s