Skip to main content

ITS Australia welcomes APC and ACCC statements on ITS

Recent statements by the Australian Productivity Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission encouraging the exploration of intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies to tackle transport challenges have been warmly welcomed by ITS Australia.
August 13, 2014 Read time: 3 mins

 Recent statements by the Australian Productivity Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission encouraging the exploration of intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies to tackle transport challenges have been warmly welcomed by 858 ITS Australia.

The Productivity Commission inquiry Report on Public Infrastructure recommended that the Australian Government actively encourage State and Territory Governments to undertake pilot studies on the use of vehicle telematics for distance and location road charging for cars and other light vehicles.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) recommended that congestion pricing should be on the table in any debate over further economic reform. The ACCC believes that unlike other parts of the economy, the prices paid by road users do not reflect the economic cost of using roads.

ITS Australia chief executive officer Susan Harris said that ITS can now support a much more sophisticated approach to charging for road use, which is more closely matched to actual usage.  

“Traditional approaches of registration fees and fuel excise have worked to a point, but we now have the technology to support a fairer, more sophisticated approach that will deliver community safety and efficiency benefits,” she said.

“ITS can also increase the productivity of roads. Existing roads in Australia now carry more traffic than ever with the aid of electronic traffic management systems. This is thanks to systems such as ramp metering, variable speed signs, ramp signals, traffic light coordination, in-car GPS and others.

“When new roads are built, ITS tools built into the new infrastructure maximise the return on the community’s investment. By better managing traffic, these systems also make roads safer,” Harris continued.

The Productivity Commission said that more direct charging of light vehicles has the potential to provide a better road system for motorists, if combined with reforms that hypothecate the revenue to road provision as a price for a service.

The Commission considers that the best way forward is for the State and Territory Governments to use the opportunity created by developments in vehicle telematics to trial direct charging for light vehicles across their road networks.

The report recommends report that the Australian Government should offer to partly fund these pilot studies and work with the States and Territories to address privacy concerns and share lessons from the trials and overseas experience. It also recommends that motorists are directly involved via roads and motorists associations.

“ITS Australia welcomes the Productivity Commission and the ACCC recommendations to support the use of technology to more effectively manage congestion and road user charging. We now have access to proven, low cost technologies to support distance and location based charging.  The move to distance and location based charging provides a framework to increase both the safety and efficiency of our road network,” said Harris.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Rating agency Standard and Poor Tolling sees a bright future for tolling
    September 6, 2017
    Few disruptions appear on the horizon for global toll road operators, with the US poised to become a better bet for major investment, according to ratings agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P’s) Global Ratings’ 2017 report, which rates toll road operators according to their ability to raise capital. The outlook is generally stable for business conditions and credit quality for toll roads worldwide. One positive exception is the US where the overall outlook is ‘positive’ as S&P expects traffic growth to increase
  • Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    February 2, 2012
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.
  • Need for balance on UK speed enforcement funding cuts
    February 2, 2012
    Trevor Ellis, Chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the implications of the UK Government's decision to withdraw funding for road safety camera partnerships
  • Is road user charging the first stop for congestion management?
    July 23, 2012
    David Hytch, Information Systems Director at the Greater Manchester Public Transport Executive, considers just where congestion pricing schemes should sit in transport planners' hierarchy of options for managing demand. On the face of it, Greater Manchester in England's proposed congestion charging scheme hit just about every sweet spot possible when it came to convincing the general public of the need for and benefits of such a venture. There was the promise from national government of almost £3bn-worth of